Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime/avibactam in Patients with Infections Caused by Β-Lactamase-producing Gram-negative Pathogens: a Pooled Analysis from the Phase 3 Clinical Trial Programme.

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy(2023)SCI 2区SCI 1区

Univ Barcelona | Pfizer | AbbVie | Antimicrobial Dev Specialists LLC | Washington Univ

Cited 0|Views31
Abstract
Objectives: This post hoc pooled analysis evaluated clinical and microbiological outcomes and safety in patients with infections caused by beta-lactamase-producing Gram-negative pathogens across five Phase 3, randomized, controlled, multicentre trials of ceftazidime/avibactam in adults with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI)/pyelonephritis and nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Methods: In each trial, RECLAIM/RECLAIM 3 (cIAI), REPRISE (cIAI/cUTI), RECAPTURE (cUTI) and REPROVE (NP, including VAP) patients were randomized 1:1 to IV ceftazidime/avibactam (plus metronidazole for patients with cIAI) or comparators (carbapenems in >97% patients) for 5-21 days. Clinical and microbiological responses at the test-of-cure visit were assessed for patients with ESBLs, and/or plasmidic and/or overexpression of chromosomal AmpC, and/or serine carbapenemases without MBLs identified in baseline Gram-negative isolates by phenotypic screening and molecular characterization in the pooled microbiological modified ITT (mMITT) population. Results: In total, 813 patients (ceftazidime/avibactam, n = 389; comparator, n = 424) had =1 beta-lactamase-producing baseline pathogen identified, amongst whom 792 patients (ceftazidime/avibactam, n = 379; comparator, n = 413) had no MBLs. The most frequent beta-lactamase-producing pathogens across treatment groups were Escherichia coli (n = 381), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 261) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 53). Clinical cure rates in the pooled non-MBL beta-lactamase-producing mMITT population were 88.1% (334/379) for ceftazidime/avibactam and 88.1% (364/413) for comparators; favourable microbiological response rates were 76.5% (290/379) and 68.8% (284/413), respectively. The safety profile of ceftazidime/avibactam was consistent with previous observations. Conclusions: This analysis provides supportive evidence of the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with infections caused by ESBLs, AmpC and serine carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative pathogens.
More
Translated text
Key words
Beta-lactam Antibiotics
求助PDF
上传PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
  • Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
  • We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
  • We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
  • The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
  • Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Upload PDF to Generate Summary
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
LD Brown,TT Cai,A DasGupta, A Agresti,BA Coull,G Casella, C Corcoran, C Mehta, M Ghosh, TJ Santner
2001

被引用4109 | 浏览

Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:本研究通过五个Ⅲ期随机对照多中心临床试验的汇总分析,评估了β-内酰胺酶产生的大肠杆菌等革兰氏阴性病原体感染患者使用头孢他啶/阿维巴坦的临床和微生物学结果及安全性,结果显示其疗效和安全性均好于对照组。

方法】:每个试验中,患者被1:1随机分配接受静脉头孢他啶/阿维巴坦(对于cIAI患者加用甲硝唑)或对照治疗(多为碳青霉烯类),治疗5-21天。对ESBLs、质粒介导的和/或染色体AmpC过表达的和对丝氨酸β-内酰胺酶无抑制的基线革兰氏阴性分离株,通过表型筛选和分子特征分析,评估了非MBL β-内酰胺酶产生患者的临床和微生物学反应。

实验】:共813名患者(头孢他啶/阿维巴坦组389名,对照组424名)有至少一种基线β-内酰胺酶产生病原体,其中792名患者(头孢他啶/阿维巴坦组379名,对照组413名)无MBLs。最常见的β-内酰胺酶产生病原体为埃希氏 coli(381例)、肺炎克雷伯菌(261例)和铜绿假单胞菌(53例)。在非MBL β-内酰胺酶产生人群中,头孢他啶/阿维巴坦组的临床治愈率为88.1%,对照组也为88.1%;有利的微生物学反应率分别为76.5%和68.8%。头孢他啶/阿维巴坦的安全性与之前观察一致。

数据集名称:并未直接提及具体数据集名称,但根据文中的描述,可以推断涉及的数据集与各临床试验相关,如RECLAIM/RECLAIM 3, REPRISE, RECAPTURE和REPROVE等。