基本信息
浏览量:2
职业迁徙
个人简介
Our research centers upon two key aspects of undergraduate biology education: faculty teaching and student learning. The broad mission is to understand how faculty teaching promotes student learning, what factors support sustainable classroom innovations, and how students learn core concepts and develop core competencies in biological sciences.
Specifically, we investigate how faculty conceptions (beliefs and understanding) and approaches (intentions and strategies) to teaching inform instructional practices in the classroom. Current projects include identifying specific faculty actions in different instructional practices (e.g. the use of personal response devices or “clickers”) that correlate with positive student outcomes, examining the underlying conceptions and approaches to teaching that are aligned with effective instructional practices, and exploring factors that promote sustainable faculty implementation of these practices. We use a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods (e.g. surveys, observations, interviews, and statistics) to examine how faculty teach in a longitudinal timeframe (i.e. over multiple years and many courses).
For student learning, we are interested in defining learning progressions for core concepts and competencies in biological sciences. Learning progressions are descriptions of increasingly sophisticated ways of thinking about a concept or performing a task. Essentially, learning progressions are conceptual pathways that students navigate as they develop understanding of a concept or skills in a competency. Defining learning progressions will provide the theoretical foundation to design instructional material that specifically targets transitions along these conceptual pathways. We are interested in understanding how students and scientists formulate arguments based on evidence and to develop instructional material that promote learning in scientific argumentation.
Specifically, we investigate how faculty conceptions (beliefs and understanding) and approaches (intentions and strategies) to teaching inform instructional practices in the classroom. Current projects include identifying specific faculty actions in different instructional practices (e.g. the use of personal response devices or “clickers”) that correlate with positive student outcomes, examining the underlying conceptions and approaches to teaching that are aligned with effective instructional practices, and exploring factors that promote sustainable faculty implementation of these practices. We use a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods (e.g. surveys, observations, interviews, and statistics) to examine how faculty teach in a longitudinal timeframe (i.e. over multiple years and many courses).
For student learning, we are interested in defining learning progressions for core concepts and competencies in biological sciences. Learning progressions are descriptions of increasingly sophisticated ways of thinking about a concept or performing a task. Essentially, learning progressions are conceptual pathways that students navigate as they develop understanding of a concept or skills in a competency. Defining learning progressions will provide the theoretical foundation to design instructional material that specifically targets transitions along these conceptual pathways. We are interested in understanding how students and scientists formulate arguments based on evidence and to develop instructional material that promote learning in scientific argumentation.
研究兴趣
论文共 65 篇作者统计合作学者相似作者
按年份排序按引用量排序主题筛选期刊级别筛选合作者筛选合作机构筛选
时间
引用量
主题
期刊级别
合作者
合作机构
CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATIONno. 2 (2024)
Sheila Swartz, Natalya Beneschott,Tracy Zembles, Fatima Anibaba,Stanley Lo,Peter Havens,Michelle Mitchell
CLINICAL PEDIATRICSno. 7 (2024): 921-928
CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATIONno. 3 (2024)
biorxiv(2024)
CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATIONno. 2 (2024)
FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION (2024)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEM EDUCATIONno. 1 (2023): 1-20
Qi Cui,Joshua P. Le,Albert Chai, Andrew S. Lee, Jitarth Sheth,Kevin Banh,Priya Pahal, Katherine Ly,Stanley M. Lo
Journal of open source softwareno. 88 (2023): 5143-5143
Journal of Biological Chemistryno. 3 (2023): 103484-103484
加载更多
作者统计
#Papers: 67
#Citation: 1213
H-Index: 13
G-Index: 34
Sociability: 5
Diversity: 2
Activity: 17
合作学者
合作机构
D-Core
- 合作者
- 学生
- 导师
数据免责声明
页面数据均来自互联网公开来源、合作出版商和通过AI技术自动分析结果,我们不对页面数据的有效性、准确性、正确性、可靠性、完整性和及时性做出任何承诺和保证。若有疑问,可以通过电子邮件方式联系我们:report@aminer.cn