Graham Mcleod
A study by postgraduate students at the University of Cape Town compared the UML and Rational Unified Process (RUP) combination to the Inspired Method with respect to complexity, quality and efficacy using the Castellani and Method Points; Krogstie and colleagues; and NIMSAD approaches respectively. This paper summarises the findings, learnings and areas for future research from the earlier report. The results indicate that the UML is lacking in the area of business analysis, especially strategic alignment of information systems with business goals and business process modeling. The Inspired method offers improved business analysis support and a wider planning perspective, but does not provide as much detail in expressing software design as does the UML/RUP. The Inspired method provides a more economical notation, but is not well supported in third party tools. Observations are made regarding challenges of applying the methods evaluation approaches and areas for future research are suggested
关注
立即认领
分享
关注
立即认领
分享
基本信息
浏览量:0
职业迁徙
个人简介
暂无内容
研究兴趣
论文共 23 篇作者统计合作学者相似作者
按年份排序按引用量排序主题筛选期刊级别筛选合作者筛选合作机构筛选
时间
引用量
主题
期刊级别
合作者
合作机构
The Practice of Enterprise Modeling (2023)
引用0浏览0EI引用
0
0
NEUROLOGYno. 18 (2022)
引用0浏览0引用
0
0
PoEM Doctoral Consortiumpp.15-30, (2018)
引用23浏览0EI引用
23
0
加载更多
作者统计
合作学者
合作机构
D-Core
- 合作者
- 学生
- 导师
数据免责声明
页面数据均来自互联网公开来源、合作出版商和通过AI技术自动分析结果,我们不对页面数据的有效性、准确性、正确性、可靠性、完整性和及时性做出任何承诺和保证。若有疑问,可以通过电子邮件方式联系我们:report@aminer.cn