Baseline Measurements of Cellular Respiration Affect the Response to Thiamine Treatment in Post-arrest Patients
CIRCULATION(2024)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Cente | Tufts University | Montefiore Medical Center
Abstract
Introduction: Lactic acidosis and impaired oxygen extraction due to mitochondrial dysfunction are common post-arrest. Thiamine, a cofactor for pyruvate dehydrogenase, is necessary for aerobic metabolism. In two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing the effect of thiamine vs. placebo in out-of-hospital and in-hospital post-arrest patients (NCT03450707 and NCT02974257), no relationship was found between thiamine treatment and the primary outcome of change in lactate over 24 hours. Cellular oxygen consumption rates (OCRs) were measured in a subset of patients at baseline. Maximal and spare OCRs measure the capacity of mitochondria to increase cellular respiration from their basal state when stimulated, and may identify patients likely to benefit from thiamine. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the two RCTs to evaluate the primary outcome in subgroups defined by baseline OCRs. Hypothesis: Patients with higher maximal and spare OCRs at baseline are more likely to benefit from thiamine treatment, as indicated by lower lactate levels. Methods: Basal, maximal and spare OCRs, collected at enrollment, were measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells using an XFe96 Extracellular Flux Analyzer and XF Cell Mito Stress Test Kit (Seahorse Bioscience). Lactates (at 6, 12, and 24 hours) were log-transformed and analyzed using a linear mixed model controlling for baseline lactate. In patients who expired <24 hours, lactate was imputed using the last available value with a 20% increase. Subgroups were defined by baseline OCR values above or below the median. The primary outcome was lactate at 24 hours, presented as a geometric mean difference (GMD). Results: A total of 74 patients had baseline OCR measurements. There was no statistically significant difference in lactate at 24 hours between placebo and thiamine in all patients (p=0.179) or in the low OCR (below median) groups. In patients with baseline maximum or spare OCRs above the median, lactate levels were significantly lower in those receiving thiamine (24 hour GMDs of 0.61 (95% CI: 0.45-0.82; p=0.001), and 0.53 (95% CI: 0.38-0.74; p<0.001), respectively; Figure 1). Conclusion: In a post-hoc analysis of two RCTs, thiamine significantly improved the primary outcome in the subgroup of patients with higher spare and maximal oxygen consumption rates at baseline. Baseline OCRs could potentially identify post-arrest patients likely to benefit from thiamine.
MoreTranslated text
求助PDF
上传PDF
View via Publisher
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
- Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
- We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
- We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
- The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
- Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Upload PDF to Generate Summary
Must-Reading Tree
Example

Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper