FP1.10 - Functional Outcomes of a Standard Vs Modified Brooke Ileostomy – A Quality of Life Study

Abstract Aim Previous studies have shown that IBD patients with a modified Brooke ileostomy, where there is retention of the ileocolic sphincter, may have improved stoma function by preserving a functional high pressure zone. This study aims to review functional outcomes through a patient-reported quality of life survey. Methods This cohort study was conducted across two sites, one performing Standard Brooke Ileostomy (SBI), and the other Modified Brooke Ileostomy (MBI), as standard practice. Patients with diagnosis of colitis were identified from a prospectively collected database. A stoma activity log and a validated stoma Quality of Life survey (PRATO) was sent, with 23 responses obtained (14 MBI, 9 SBI). Activity log included bag emptying, hours of interrupted sleep, and number of visits to stoma nurse. Results For QoL survey (minimum score 20, max 80), patients with MBI scored higher (mean 55.36), compared to SBI (mean 48.22), (p=0.037). Bag emptying over 24 hours was similar (MBI mean 5.71, SBI mean 5.86), as was bag emptying overnight (MBI mean 1 (range 0-3), SBO mean 1 (range 1-2). MBI patients reported longer mean uninterrupted sleep (7.07 hours vs 5.43 hours (p=0.005)). MBI patients required fewer stoma nurse visits in the first year (mean 5.3, median 5, range 0-13). SBI (mean 10.7, median 10, range 2-33). Conclusion A practice of Modified Brooke Ileostomy has comparable patient reported quality of life outcomes to a standard Brooke Ileostomy and performs better overall in terms of less interruption to sleep and lower disruption of daily life through hospital visits.