Prophylactic Left Atrial Appendage Ligation During CABG: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Objective To evaluate short-term outcomes and statewide practice patterns of prophylactic left atrial appendage ligation (P-LAAL) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients without pre-operative atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods Adult patients who underwent an on-pump CABG (2017 - 2023) within a regional collaborative were identified. Patients with a history of AF, previous cardiac surgery, or non-device based LAAL were excluded. Patients were stratified by LAAL status and were propensity score matched. Univariable analysis was used to compare short-term clinical outcomes. Results Of 16,547 patients examined, 442 underwent P-LAAL. The propensity score matched cohort (439 P-LAAL, 439 No P-LAAL) was compared and had no significant differences in pre-operative CHA2DS2-VASc scores or operative variables. The P-LAAL group had longer cross clamp time (82 vs 76 minutes, p=0.001), ICU hours (72 vs 66, p=0.001), length of stay (6.0 vs 6.0 days, p=0.010), increased post-operative AF (35% vs 24%, p<0.001), and more discharge on anticoagulation (17% vs 8.2%, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in post-operative stroke (1.1% vs 2.1%, p=0.423), readmission (13% vs 9.6%, p=0.118), operative mortality (2.5% vs 1.6%, p=0.480), or readmission for thrombotic or bleeding complications (0.7% vs 1.1%, p=0.724). Hospitalization costs were significantly higher for P-LAAL patients ($43,478 vs $40,645, p<0.001). The rate of P-LAAL during CABG increased from 1.61% (2017) to 5.65% (2023) (p<0.001). Conclusions Despite higher rates of post-operative AF, discharge on anticoagulation, and hospitalization costs in patients undergoing P-LAAL during CABG, there was no difference in short-term clinical endpoints including stroke and operative mortality.