Lamotrigine Vs Levetiracetam in Female Patients of Childbearing Age with Juvenile Absence Epilepsy: A Bayesian Reanalysis

Emanuele Cerulli Irelli, Enrico Cocchi,Joanna Gesche,Javier Pena-Ceballos, Roberto H. Caraballo, Simona Lattanzi,Gionata Strigaro,Biagio Orlando,Patrick B. Moloney, Cecilia Catania, Edoardo Ferlazzo,Angelo Pascarella,Sara Casciato, Chiara Pizzanelli,Chiara Milano,Loretta Giuliano, Veronica Viola,Barbara Mostacci, Francesco Fortunato,Patrizia Pulitano,Eleonora Rosati, Marco Perulli,Norman Delanty, Giancarlo Di Gennaro,Antonio Gambardella, Angelo Labate, Francesca F. Operto, Anna T. Giallonardo,Betul Baykan,Christoph P. Beier, Carlo Di Bonaventura

EPILEPSIA(2024)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
ObjectiveWomen of childbearing age with juvenile absence epilepsy (JAE) face treatment challenges due to limited access to safe and effective anti-seizure medications (ASMs). In a previous study we compared the effectiveness of levetiracetam (LEV) and lamotrigine (LTG) in women with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), highlighting a superiority of LEV in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. In this study, we specifically reanalyzed, through a Bayesian approach and by expanding the previously published cohort, the comparative effectiveness of these ASMs as initial monotherapy in JAE.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter, retrospective, comparative effectiveness study on women of childbearing age diagnosed with JAE and prescribed LEV or LTG as the initial ASM. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) Bayesian Cox proportional hazard models were employed to evaluate treatment failure (TF) due to ineffectiveness and ASM retention. The patients' center of provenance and year of prescription were considered as random effect factors. Posterior probabilities and relative log-risk distribution were computed, and the distribution of posterior draws was analyzed to assess the evidence supporting LTG superiority over LEV.ResultsOf 123 patients, those treated with LTG (n = 67) demonstrated lower TF and higher ASM retention than those treated with LEV (n = 56), with the IPTW-weighted Bayesian Cox proportional hazards model showing a 99.2% posterior probability of LTG being superior on TF and a 99.5% probability on ASM retention. Additional analyses on >= 50% and >= 75% seizure reduction through IPTW-weighted Bayesian logistic regression largely confirmed these findings, whereas the two ASMs did not show evident differences in terms of seizure freedom. The two ASMs showed comparable safety profiles, with only a minority of patients discontinuing treatment due to side effects.SignificanceBayesian reanalysis supports LTG as first-line monotherapy for JAE in women of childbearing age, emphasizing the importance of individualized treatment strategies in women with IGE. This study underscores the value of Bayesian methods in refining clinical research and treatment decisions.
更多
查看译文
关键词
anti-seizure medication (ASM),first-line,idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE),monotherapy,women
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要