Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Genetic Counselling Legislation and Practice in Cancer in EU Member States

European Journal of Public Health(2024)

Hannover Med Sch | Sciensano | Ghent Univ Hosp | Erasmus MC | European Alliance Personalised Med | Med Univ | Catalan Inst Oncol | Victor Babes Univ Med & Pharm | Inst Curie | Minist Hlth | Reg Skane | Mater Dei Hosp | Vilnius Univ | Lab Natl Sante | Univ Debrecen | Inst Oncol | Riga East Clin Univ | Univ Tartu | Unilabs | Univ Porto | St Catherine Specialty Hosp | Labdia Labordiagnost | Department of Human Genetics | Inst Hematol & Blood Transfus | Cyprus Inst Neurol & Genet | Ctr Res & Technol Hellas | Med Univ Warsaw | Univ Helsinki | Mater Misericordiae Univ Hosp | Radboud Univ Nijmegen | State Res Inst Ctr Innovat Med | Rigshosp | Univ Hosp Ctr Zagreb | Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore | Hannover Med Sch MHH

Cited 0|Views6
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Somatic and germline genetic alterations are significant drivers of cancer. Increasing integration of new technologies which profile these alterations requires timely, equitable and high-quality genetic counselling to facilitate accurate diagnoses and informed decision-making by patients and their families in preventive and clinical settings. This article aims to provide an overview of genetic counselling legislation and practice across European Union (EU) Member States to serve as a foundation for future European recommendations and action. METHODS:National legislative databases of all 27 Member States were searched using terms relevant to genetic counselling, translated as appropriate. Interviews with relevant experts from each Member State were conducted to validate legislative search results and provide detailed insights into genetic counselling practice in each country. RESULTS:Genetic counselling is included in national legislative documents of 22 of 27 Member States, with substantial variation in legal mechanisms and prescribed details (i.e. the 'who, what, when and where' of counselling). Practice is similarly varied. Workforce capacity (25 of 27 Member States) and genetic literacy (all Member States) were common reported barriers. Recognition and/or better integration of genetic counsellors and updated legislation and were most commonly noted as the 'most important change' which would improve practice. CONCLUSIONS:This review highlights substantial variability in genetic counselling across EU Member States, as well as common barriers notwithstanding this variation. Future recommendations and action should focus on addressing literacy and capacity challenges through legislative, regulatory and/or strategic approaches at EU, national, regional and/or local levels.
More
Translated text
PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
  • Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
  • We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
  • We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
  • The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
  • Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Try using models to generate summary,it takes about 60s
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:本文概述了欧盟成员国在癌症遗传咨询立法和实践方面的现状,发现存在较大差异,并提出了改进建议。

方法】:通过检索27个成员国的国家立法数据库,并采访相关专家,验证立法搜索结果并深入了解各国的遗传咨询实践。

实验】:本研究未涉及具体的实验操作和数据集,而是通过文献和专家访谈收集信息,发现遗传咨询在22个成员国的立法文件中有涉及,但具体细节和法律机制存在较大差异,同时识别出遗传咨询实践中的常见障碍。