Outcomes and Safety of Transcaval Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BackgroundThe transcaval (TCv) vascular approach is increasingly utilized in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), in patients unsuitable for the gold-standard transfemoral approach. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes associated with TCv-TAVR.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by searching PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library for all articles assessing the TCv approach published until December 2023. Outcomes included 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality (ACM), 30-day rehospitalization, peri-operative and post-operative complications at 30 days. The meta-analysis was registered on the PROSPERO database with the identifier CRD42024501921.ResultsA total of eight studies with 467 patients were included. TCv-TAVR procedures achieved a success rate of 98.5%. TCv-TAVR was associated with a 30-day ACM rate of 6.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.9-8.2%), a one-year ACM rate of 14.4% (95% CI: 2.3- 27.6%) and a 30-day rehospitalization rate at of 4.4% (95% CI: 2.2-10.6%). Postoperative stroke or transient ischemic attack, major vascular complications and major or life-threatening bleeding occurred in 3.9%, 8.5% and 10.1% of cases, respectively. Cumulative meta-analyses showed a trend of decreasing rates of vascular complications.ConclusionsThe TCv approach in TAVR demonstrated a reassuring efficacy and safety profile, with mortality and post-operative complication rates comparable to those reported for supra-aortic alternative TAVR access routes. The temporal decrease in vascular complications suggests potential improvements in procedural techniques and device technology. These findings further support the TCv approach as a viable option in patients ineligible for the transfemoral access.