Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Closure of the Peritoneum in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP) with Cyanoacrylate Glue in a Microdroplet Device: A Single Surgeon Prospective Comparison Vs. Barbed Suture

Journal of Abdominal Wall Surgery(2024)

Virgen del Rocío University Hospital | Quirónsalud Sacred Heart Hospital | Virgen Macarena University Hospital

Cited 0|Views10
Abstract
Purpose:To describe and compare a peritoneal closure technique using cyanoacrylate glue (Glubran 2®, GEM, Cardiolink SL) with a microdroplet device (Glutack®, GEM, Cardiolink SL) in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) of inguinal hernia with the routinely used barbed suture peritoneal closure (V-Lock 3.0, Covidien France).Materials and methods:From January to August 2022, 60 patients undergoing TAPP repair for uni- or bilateral inguinal hernia were randomized into one of two groups. One using as mesh fixation and peritoneal closure the Glutack® device with Glubran 2® cyanoacrylate glue (Glu-close group) and the other using mesh fixation with cyanoacrylate and peritoneal closure with V-lock 3.0 (Sut-close group), with a follow-up of 12 months. Demographic variables, operative time, peritoneal closure time, main surgical findings and main intra- and postoperative complications were analyzed prospectively.Results:63 patients were included with no losses to follow-up. The mean operative time was 34 min (range 58.25) for the glu-close group and 40 (range 64.25) for the sut-close group, with no conversion (0%) for either group. The mean flap closure time was 1.18 min (SD 24 0.19) for the glu-close group and 3.24 min (SD 0.78) for the sut-close group, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.001). The intraoperative complication rate was 0 for the glu-close group and 0 for the sut-close group, with no significant difference. The median hospital stay was 0.8 days (range, 0-1) for both groups. The median duration of follow-up was 12 months and none had hernia recurrence. The postoperative VAS score at the first and second check-up at 1 month and 3 months was 2.83 (SD 1.341) and 0.60 (SD 0.621) in the sut-close group and 1.03 (0.984) and 0.24 (SD 0.435) in the glue-close group, with significant differences (p < 0.001 and p < 0.012).Conclusion:The data demonstrated by the study are that the glue can be used safely to close the peritoneum and that the method provides a small, statistically significant but not clinically relevant reduction in the time to close the peritoneal flap, as well as in postoperative pain after surgery in short and medium term.
More
Translated text
Key words
closure peritoneum,TAPP,hernia,laparoscopy,glue
PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
  • Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
  • We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
  • We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
  • The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
  • Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Try using models to generate summary,it takes about 60s
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:本研究旨在描述并比较在腔镜下经腹膜前修补术(TAPP)中使用微滴装置的氰基丙烯酸胶与常规使用的倒刺缝合线进行腹膜闭合的效果。

方法】:研究将60名接受单侧或双侧腹股沟疝TAPP修补的患者随机分为两组,一组使用微滴装置的氰基丙烯酸胶进行腹膜闭合(Glu-close组),另一组使用倒刺缝合线进行腹膜闭合(Sut-close组),并进行12个月的随访。

实验】:63名患者被纳入研究,无随访损失。Glu-close组的平均手术时间为34分钟,Sut-close组为40分钟,两组均无中转开腹。Glu-close组的平均腹膜闭合时间为1.18分钟,Sut-close组为3.24分钟,两组间存在统计学差异。两组术中并发症发生率均为0,住院时间中位数均为0.8天,随访12个月无疝复发。术后1个月和3个月的VAS评分在Glu-close组明显低于Sut-close组。