Venous Vascular Closure System Vs. Figure-of-eight Suture Following Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: the STYLE-AF Study

Roland Richard Tilz,Marcel Feher,Julia Vogler, Kerstin Bode, Alexandru Ionut Duta, Angela Ortolan,Lisbeth Delgado Lopez, Mirco Kuechler, Roman Mamaev,Evgeny Lyan,Philipp Sommer, Martin Braun, Vanessa Sciacca, Thomas Demming,Vera Maslova,Karl-Heinz Kuck, Christian-Hendrik Heeger,Charlotte Eitel,Sorin Stefan Popescu

Europace(2024)

引用 0|浏览10
暂无评分
摘要
AIMS:Simplified ablation technologies for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are increasingly performed worldwide. One of the most common complications following PVI are vascular access-related complications. Lately, venous closure systems (VCSs) were introduced into clinical practice, aiming to reduce the time of bed rest, to increase the patients' comfort, and to reduce vascular access-related complications. The aim of the present study is to compare the safety and efficacy of using a VCS to achieve haemostasis following single-shot PVI to the actual standard of care [figure-of-eight suture and manual compression (MC)]. METHODS AND RESULTS:This is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, controlled, open-label trial performed at three German centres. Patients were randomized 1:1 to undergo haemostasis either by means of VCS (VCS group) or of a figure-of-eight suture and MC (F8 group). The primary efficacy endpoint was the time to ambulation, while the primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major periprocedural adverse events until hospital discharge. A total of 125 patients were randomized. The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The VCS group showed a shorter time to ambulation [109.0 (82.0, 160.0) vs. 269.0 (243.8, 340.5) min; P < 0.001], shorter time to haemostasis [1 (1, 2) vs. 5 (2, 10) min; P < 0.001], and shorter time to discharge eligibility [270 (270, 270) vs. 340 (300, 458) min; P < 0.001]. No major vascular access-related complication was reported in either group. A trend towards a lower incidence of minor vascular access-related complications on the day of procedure was observed in the VCS group [7 (11.1%) vs. 15 (24.2%); P = 0.063] as compared to the control group. CONCLUSION:Following AF ablation, the use of a VCS results in a significantly shorter time to ambulation, time to haemostasis, and time to discharge eligibility. No major vascular access-related complications were identified. The use of MC and a figure-of-eight suture showed a trend towards a higher incidence of minor vascular access-related complications.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Atrial fibrillation,Cryoballoon,Pulse field ablation,Vascular closure device,Complications
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要