Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Empirical Assessment of the Assumptions of ComBat with Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Journal of medical imaging(2024)

Vanderbilt Univ | NIA | Imperial Coll London

Cited 0|Views43
Abstract
Purpose Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a magnetic resonance imaging technique that provides unique information about white matter microstructure in the brain but is susceptible to confounding effects introduced by scanner or acquisition differences. ComBat is a leading approach for addressing these site biases. However, despite its frequent use for harmonization, ComBat's robustness toward site dissimilarities and overall cohort size have not yet been evaluated in terms of DTI. Approach As a baseline, we match N=358 participants from two sites to create a "silver standard" that simulates a cohort for multi-site harmonization. Across sites, we harmonize mean fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity, calculated using participant DTI data, for the regions of interest defined by the JHU EVE-Type III atlas. We bootstrap 10 iterations at 19 levels of total sample size, 10 levels of sample size imbalance between sites, and 6 levels of mean age difference between sites to quantify (i) beta AGE, the linear regression coefficient of the relationship between FA and age; (ii) gamma<^>sf*, the ComBat-estimated site-shift; and (iii) delta<^>sf*, the ComBat-estimated site-scaling. We characterize the reliability of ComBat by evaluating the root mean squared error in these three metrics and examine if there is a correlation between the reliability of ComBat and a violation of assumptions. Results ComBat remains well behaved for beta AGE when N>162 and when the mean age difference is less than 4 years. The assumptions of the ComBat model regarding the normality of residual distributions are not violated as the model becomes unstable. Conclusion Prior to harmonization of DTI data with ComBat, the input cohort should be examined for size and covariate distributions of each site. Direct assessment of residual distributions is less informative on stability than bootstrap analysis. We caution use ComBat of in situations that do not conform to the above thresholds.
More
Translated text
Key words
diffusion tensor imaging,magnetic resonance imaging,ComBat,harmonization,bootstrap
PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
  • Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
  • We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
  • We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
  • The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
  • Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Try using models to generate summary,it takes about 60s
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:本文通过模拟多中心数据集,评估了 ComBat 方法在弥散张量成像(DTI)数据校正中的假设和稳定性,创新性地提出了关于 ComBat 方法在处理 DTI 数据时对样本大小和中心差异的鲁棒性评估。

方法】:研究采用匹配和 Bootstrap 重采样技术,对两个不同中心的 358 名参与者的 DTI 数据进行校正,并通过 JHU EVE-Type III 脑图谱定义感兴趣区域。

实验】:通过对不同样本大小、中心间样本大小不平衡和中心间平均年龄差异的情况进行 10 次迭代,评估了 ComBat 校正的可靠性,并考察了 ComBat 鲁棒性与假设违反之间的相关性。结果显示,当样本量 N>162 和中心间平均年龄差异小于 4 年时,ComBat 对 βAGE 的处理表现良好,且 ComBat 模型在残差分布的正态性假设上并未违反。

创新点:该研究首次对 ComBat 方法在 DTI 数据校正中的鲁棒性进行了实证评估,为多中心 DTI 数据的一致性校正提供了重要的方法学指导。