RESPONSE TO COMMENTARY: LONG-TERM BLADDER OUTCOMES USING A PRESCRIBER PATTERN SCORING SYSTEM FOR POSTERIOR URETHRAL VALVES

BackgroundUrinary drainage for posterior urethral valves can be achieved with valve ablation (VA) or diversion by vesicostomy (VES) or cutaneous ureterostomy (CU). The effect of these interventions on long-term bladder function remains debated, and voiding symptomatology after VES or CU reversal has been poorly characterized.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to examine the prevalence and scope of physician treatment patterns as a surrogate for retention or incontinence symptomatology among PUV patients undergoing primary VA or diversion by VES/CU and determine rates of progression to augmentation.Study DesignThis is a single-institution retrospective cohort study. Retention Scores (R) were calculated 1 point for: retention behavior (double/timed void), alpha-blocker, intermittent catheterization, or overnight indwelling catheter. Incontinence Scores (I) were calculated 1 point for: incontinence behavior (double/timed void), oral medication, or botulinum toxin. Patients with R score above 3 or I score above 2 were deemed to have severe retention or incontinence symptomatology respectively. End stage bladder (ESB) was defined as need for bladder augmentation.ResultsWe identified 76 patients between 5-40 years old with median follow-up of 14.6 [5.0-40.4) years. There was no difference in the rates of severe retention or incontinence treatment pattern scoring between VA versus VES/CU (Figure). Rates of achieving R(1) status are similar between VA and VES/CU groups, though age of reaching R(1) was younger for those with VES/CU (4.8 years) compared to VA (6.6 years). There was no significant difference in rate of ESB by intervention category VA (9.4%) versus VES/CU (17.4%; p=0.323).DiscussionTreatment of retention symptomatology was more common than treatment of incontinence symptomatology regardless of primary management, VA or VES/CU. This study also indicates that VES/CU patients were just as responsive as VA patients to conservative treatments (behavioral changes, pharmacotherapy) for any type of bladder symptomatology as the progression to treatment of severe symptomatology and ESB were similar between cohorts. In this cohort, bladder outcomes were not associated with type of urinary diversion (VA or VES/CU).ConclusionLong term bladder outcomes for valve patients demonstrated similar treatment patterns and progression to end-stage bladder regardless of diversion status. Patients went on to ESB approximately 4.4 years after diagnosis at similar rates between groups.