Whipple’s Cephalic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Versus Pyloric-Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION:Controversy exists in the literature as to the best technique for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), whether pyloric preservation (PP-CPD) or Whipple's technique (with antrectomy [W-CPD]), the former being associated with a higher frequency of delayed gastric emptying (DGE).METHODS:Retrospective and comparative study between PP-CPD technique (n = 124 patients) and W-CPD technique (n = 126 patients), in patients who were operated for tumors of the pancreatic head and periampullary region between the period 2012 and 2023.RESULTS:Surgical time was longer, although not significant, with the W-CPD technique. Pancreatic and peripancreatic tumor invasion (p = 0.031) and number of lymph nodes resected (p < 0.0001) reached statistical significance in W-CPD, although there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of lymph node tumor invasion. Regarding postoperative morbimortality (medical complications, postoperative pancreatic fistula [POPF], hemorrhage, RVG, re-interventions, in-hospital mortality, Clavien-Dindo complications), ICU and hospital stay, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups. During follow-up, no significant differences were observed between the groups for morbidity and mortality at 90 days and survival at 1, 3 and 5 years. Binary logistic regression analysis for DGE showed that binary relevant POPF grade B/C was a significant risk factor for DGE.CONCLUSIONS:Postoperative morbidity and mortality and long-term survival were not significantly different with PP-CPD and W-CPD, but POPF grade B/C was a risk factor for DGE grade C.