Noninvasive- and invasive mapping reveals similar language network centralities – A function-based connectome analysis

Background Former comparisons between direct cortical stimulation (DCS) and navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) only focused on cortical mapping. While both can be combined with diffusion tensor imaging, their differences in the visualization of subcortical and even network levels remain unclear. Network centrality is an essential parameter in network analysis to measure the importance of nodes identified by mapping. Those include Degree centrality, Eigenvector centrality, Closeness centrality, Betweenness centrality, and PageRank centrality. While DCS and nTMS have repeatedly been compared on the cortical level, the underlying network identified by both has not been investigated yet. Method 27 patients with brain lesions necessitating preoperative nTMS and intraoperative DCS language mapping during awake craniotomy were enrolled. Function-based connectome analysis was performed based on the cortical nodes obtained through the two mapping methods, and language-related network centralities were compared. Results Compared with DCS language mapping, the positive predictive value of cortical nTMS language mapping is 74.1%, with good consistency of tractography for the arcuate fascicle and superior longitudinal fascicle. Moreover, network centralities did not differ between the two mapping methods. However, ventral stream tracts can be better traced based on nTMS mappings, demonstrating its strengths in acquiring language-related networks. In addition, it showed lower centralities than other brain areas, with decentralization as an indicator of language function loss. Conclusion This study deepens the understanding of language-related functional anatomy and proves that non-invasive mapping-based network analysis is comparable to the language network identified via invasive cortical mapping.