Comparison of Efficacy Between Clazosentan and Fasudil Hydrochloride-Based Management of Vasospasm after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Focusing on Older and WFNS Grade V Patients: a Single-Center Experience in Japan

Subarachnoid hemorrhage often leads to poor outcomes owing to vasospasm, even after successful aneurysm treatment. Clazosentan, an endothelin receptor inhibitor, has been proven to be an effective treatment for vasospasms in a Japanese randomized controlled trial. However, its efficacy in older patients (≥ 75 years old) and those with World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grade V has not been demonstrated. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of clazosentan in older patients and those with WFNS grade V, using real-world data. Patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage treated before and after the introduction of clazosentan were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were categorized into two groups (clazosentan era versus pre-clazosentan era), in which vasospasm management and outcomes were compared. Vasospasms were managed with fasudil hydrochloride-based (pre-clazosentan era) or clazosentan-based treatment (clazosentan era). Seventy-eight patients were included in this study: the clazosentan era (n = 32) and pre-clazosentan era (n = 46). Overall, clazosentan significantly reduced clinical vasospasms (clazosentan era: 31.3