Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

The Assessment of Burden of ColoRectal Cancer (ABCRC)-tool; a validity and reliability study

Britt J.M. Thomassen,Merel L. Kimman, Anne M.J. Somers,Rudolf W.H.M. Ponds,Jan Willem T. Dekker, Barbara L. van Leiden,Geraldine R. Vink,Jan Willem B. de Groot,Jarno Melenhorst, Kim M.M.W. Reynders, Christel M.J. Gielen, Tom H.A. Weerts, Martijn F. Lutke Holzik,Sander M.J. van Kuijk,Stéphanie O. Breukink,Annerika H.M. Gidding-Slok

European Journal of Surgical Oncology(2024)

Cited 0|Views14
No score
Abstract
Introduction Follow-up care after treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasingly focused on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and functional outcomes. The Assessment of Burden of ColoRectal Cancer (ABCRC)-tool is developed to measure these outcomes and support patient-oriented care. The tool comprises items assessing burden of disease and lifestyle parameters. It consists of a generic module combined with one of the three CRC specific modules. The objective of this study is to assess the construct validity and reliability of the items of the ABCRC-tool. Methods Patients who were receiving follow-up care after surgical CRC treatment were invited to complete the ABCRC-tool together with other validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Construct validity was assessed by testing expected correlations between items of the ABCRC-tool and domains of other PROMs and by examining predefined hypotheses regarding differences in subgroups of patients. Patients completed the ABCRC-tool twice, with 8 days apart, to evaluate its reliability. Results In total, 177 patients participated (64% male) with a mean age of 67 years (range 33–88). The colon, rectum and stoma module were completed by subsequently 89, 53 and 35 patients. Most items correlated as expected with anticipated domains of the EORTC-QLQ-C30 or EORTC QLQ-CR29 (all p-values <0.05). Furthermore, the ABCRC-tool could discriminate between subgroups of patients. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was good (>0.70) for most items, indicating good reliability. Conclusion The ABCRC-tool is a valid and reliable instrument that is ready for use in a clinical setting to support personalized follow-up care after CRC treatment.
More
Translated text
Key words
Colorectal cancer,Patient reported outcome measure,Follow-up,Patient-oriented care
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined