Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Core Requirements of Frailty Screening in the Emergency Department: an International Delphi Consensus Study.

AGE AND AGEING(2024)

Univ Coll Cork | Washington Univ | INRCA IRCCS | Torrens Univ Australia | Leiden Univ | Amsterdam UMC | Chinese Univ Hong Kong | St Louis Univ | Univ Queensland | Univ Milan | Cork Univ Hosp | St James Hosp | St Vincents Univ Hosp | Mercy Univ Hosp | Katholieke Univ Leuven | Univ Sherbrooke | Univ Galway | Beaumont Hosp | Univ Limerick | Navamindradhiraj Univ | Univ Toronto | McMaster Univ | Univ Hosp North Midlands NHS Trust | Ohio State Univ | IWK Hlth Ctr | Vanderbilt Univ | Univ Hosp Waterford | Univ New South Wales | Univ Ottawa | UCL

Cited 1|Views43
Abstract
Introduction: Frailty is associated with adverse outcomes among patients attending emergency departments (EDs). While multiple frailty screens are available, little is known about which variables are important to incorporate and how best to facilitate accurate, yet prompt ED screening. To understand the core requirements of frailty screening in ED, we conducted an international, modified, electronic two-round Delphi consensus study. Methods: A two-round electronic Delphi involving 37 participants from 10 countries was undertaken. Statements were generated from a prior systematic review examining frailty screening instruments in ED (logistic, psychometric and clinimetric properties). Reflexive thematic analysis generated a list of 56 statements for Round 1 (August-September 2021). Four main themes identified were: (i) principles of frailty screening, (ii) practicalities and logistics, (iii) frailty domains and (iv) frailty risk factors. Results: In Round 1, 13/56 statements (23%) were accepted. Following feedback, 22 new statements were created and 35 were re-circulated in Round 2 (October 2021). Of these, 19 (54%) were finally accepted. It was agreed that ideal frailty screens should be short (<5 min), multidimensional and well-calibrated across the spectrum of frailty, reflecting baseline status 2-4 weeks before presentation. Screening should ideally be routine, prompt (<4 h after arrival) and completed at first contact in ED. Functional ability, mobility, cognition, medication use and social factors were identified as the most important variables to include. Conclusions: Although a clear consensus was reached on important requirements of frailty screening in ED, and variables to include in an ideal screen, more research is required to operationalise screening in clinical practice.
More
Translated text
Key words
frailty screening,emergency department,older adult,Delphi consensus,older people
求助PDF
上传PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
  • Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
  • We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
  • We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
  • The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
  • Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Upload PDF to Generate Summary
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:本研究通过国际德尔菲共识研究,确定了急诊部门进行虚弱筛查的核心要求和创新点,提出了理想的虚弱筛查工具应具备的特征和包含的变量。

方法】:采用两轮电子德尔菲方法,涉及来自10个国家的37名参与者,基于之前对急诊部门虚弱筛查工具的系统评价,生成56条陈述进行讨论。

实验】:在第一轮(2021年8-9月)中,接受了23%的陈述,经过反馈后,在第二轮(2021年10月)中,接受了54%的陈述,最终确定理想的虚弱筛查应快速、多维、适用于不同虚弱程度的患者,并在急诊首次接触时完成,重点考虑功能能力、活动能力、认知、用药和社会因素。