Atrial fibrillation type and long-term clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with heart failure: insight from JROADHF

Aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) type (paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent) is important in determining therapeutic management; however, clinical outcomes by AF type are largely unknown for hospitalized patients with heart failure (HF). Methods and results: The JROADHF is a retrospective, multicenter, nationwide registry of patients hospitalized for acute HF in Japan. Follow-up data were collected up to 5 years after hospitalization. Patients were divided based on diagnosis and AF type into 3 groups (without AF, paroxysmal AF, and sustained AF [defined as a composite of persistent and permanent AF]), and compared the backgrounds and outcomes between the groups. Of 12 895 hospitalized HF patients (mean age: 78 +/- 13 years, female: 6 077 [47%], and mean left ventricular ejection fraction: 47 +/- 17%), 1 725 had paroxysmal AF, and 3 672 had sustained AF. Compared with patients without AF, sustained AF had a higher risk of the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.17; P = 0.03), mainly driven by HF hospitalization (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.06-1.26; P < 0.001), whereas the corresponding risk for the primary endpoint in patients with paroxysmal AF was not elevated (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.94-1.13; P = 0.53) after adjustment by multivariable Cox regression analysis. These results were consistent among the subgroups of patients with reduced or preserved ejection fraction (interaction P = 0.74). Conclusion: Among hospitalized patients with HF, sustained AF, but not paroxysmal AF, was significantly associated with a higher risk for cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, indicating the importance of accounting for AF type in HF patients. [Graphical Abstract]