The defensible set and a new impossibility theorem in voting
CoRR(2024)
摘要
In the context of social choice theory with ordinal preferences, we say that
the defensible set is the set of alternatives x such that for any alternative
y, if y beats x in a head-to-head majority comparison, then there is an
alternative z that beats y in a head-to-head majority comparison by a
margin at least as large as the margin by which y beat x. We show that any
ordinal voting method satisfying two well-known axioms from voting
theory–positive involvement and the Condorcet winner criterion–refines the
defensible set. Using this lemma, we prove an impossibility theorem: there is
no such voting method that also satisfies the Condorcet loser criterion,
resolvability, and a common invariance property for Condorcet methods, namely
that the choice of winners depends only on the relative sizes of majority
margins.
更多查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要