The effect of aperiodic components in distinguishing Alzheimer’s disease from frontotemporal dementia

Distinguishing between Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) presents a clinical challenge. Inexpensive and accessible techniques such as electroencephalography (EEG) are increasingly being used to address this challenge. In particular, the potential relevance between aperiodic components of EEG activity and these disorders has gained interest as our understanding evolves. This study aims to determine the differences in aperiodic activity between AD and FTD and evaluate its potential for distinguishing between the two disorders. A total of 88 participants, including 36 patients with AD, 23 patients with FTD, and 29 healthy controls (CN) underwent cognitive assessment and scalp EEG acquisition. Neuronal power spectra were parameterized to decompose the EEG spectrum, enabling comparison of group differences in different components. A support vector machine was employed to assess the impact of aperiodic parameters on the differential diagnosis. Compared with the CN group, both the AD and FTD groups showed varying degrees of increased alpha power (both periodic and raw power) and theta alpha power ratio. At the channel level, theta power (both periodic and raw power) in the frontal regions was higher in the AD group compared to the FTD group, and aperiodic parameters (both exponents and offsets) in the frontal, temporal, central, and parietal regions were higher in the AD group than in the FTD group. Importantly, the inclusion of aperiodic parameters led to improved performance in distinguishing between the two disorders. These findings highlight the significance of aperiodic components in discriminating dementia-related diseases.