谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

To Maintain Qualified Privilege and Surgeon Participation, Clinical Audit Databases Must Adapt to Changing Regulations and Emerging Technologies

ANZ journal of surgery/ANZ journal of surgery(2023)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
ANZ Journal of SurgeryVolume 93, Issue 10 p. 2278-2280 EDITORIAL To maintain qualified privilege and surgeon participation, clinical audit databases must adapt to changing regulations and emerging technologies Sarah Aitken FRACS, PhD, Sarah Aitken FRACS, PhD [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0002-6701-6213 Vascular Surgery Department, Concord Institute of Academic Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editingSearch for more papers by this authorRoxanne Wu MBBS, FRACS, Roxanne Wu MBBS, FRACS Vascular Surgery Department, Cairns and Hinterland Hospital and Health Service, Cairns, Queensland, Australia Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editingSearch for more papers by this authorThodur Vasudevan MBBS, FRACS, Thodur Vasudevan MBBS, FRACS orcid.org/0000-0002-1599-7726 Vascular Surgery Department, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and the Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editingSearch for more papers by this author Sarah Aitken FRACS, PhD, Sarah Aitken FRACS, PhD [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0002-6701-6213 Vascular Surgery Department, Concord Institute of Academic Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editingSearch for more papers by this authorRoxanne Wu MBBS, FRACS, Roxanne Wu MBBS, FRACS Vascular Surgery Department, Cairns and Hinterland Hospital and Health Service, Cairns, Queensland, Australia Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editingSearch for more papers by this authorThodur Vasudevan MBBS, FRACS, Thodur Vasudevan MBBS, FRACS orcid.org/0000-0002-1599-7726 Vascular Surgery Department, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and the Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editingSearch for more papers by this author First published: 17 October 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.18656Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. References 1Narayanan A, Hanna J, Okamura-Kho A et al. Management of secondary aortic-enteric fistulae. ANZ J. Surg. 2023; 93: 2363–2369. 10.1111/ans.18441 Google Scholar 2 Australian and New Zealand Society of Vascular Surgeons. The Australian Vascular Audit (AVA), 2009. [cited 2023 July 15]. Available from: https://www.ava.net.au/. Google Scholar 3McNeil JJ, Evans SM, Johnson NP et al. Clinical-quality registries: their role in quality improvement. Med. J. Aust 2010; 192: 244–245. 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03499.x PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 4Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Datab Syst Rev 2012; 13(6): CD000259: 1465–1858. Google Scholar 5 Office of the Australian Information Commissioner. Cyber security incidents impact data breach risk. 2023. [cited 2023 July 15]. Available from: https://www.oaic.gov.au/newsroom/cyber-security-incidents-impact-data-breach-risk. Google Scholar 6 Australia Parliament. Privacy Legislation Amendement Bill 2022. 2022. [cited 2023 July 15]. Available from: https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbills%2Fr6940_first-reps%2F0000%22. Google Scholar 7 Australia Parliament. Privacy Act 1988. Canberra: Commowealth of Australia, 1988. Google Scholar 8Paige E, Doyle K, Jorm L et al. A versatile big data health system for Australia: driving improvements in cardiovascular health. Heart Lung Circ 2021; 30: 1467–1476. 10.1016/j.hlc.2021.04.023 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 9 Australian Commission for Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). Framework for Australian Clinical Quality Registries, 2nd edn. Sydney: ACSQHC, Commonwealth of Australia, 2022 [cited 2023 July 15]. Available from: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications-and-resources/resource-library/framework-australian-clinical-quality-registries-second-edition-consultation-version. Google Scholar 10 National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2007 (updated 2018). 2018. [cited 2023 July 15]. Available from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/national-statement-ethical-conduct-human-research-2007-updated-2018#download. Google Scholar 11 National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). Ethical considerations in Quality Assurance and Evaluation Activities. 2014. [cited 2023 July 15]. Available from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/resources/ethical-considerations-quality-assurance-and-evaluation-activities. Google Scholar 12 Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Understanding re-identification: Data confidentiality guide. 2021. [cited 2023 July 15]. Available from: https://www.abs.gov.au/about/data-services/data-confidentiality-guide/understanding-re-identification. Google Scholar 13Ahern S, Hopper I, Loh E. Qualified privilege legislation to support clinician quality assurance: balancing professional and public interests. Med. J. Aust 2019; 210: 343–346. 10.5694/mja2.50124 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 14 Government of Australia. Overview of the Commonwealth Qualified Privilege Scheme. 2019. [cited 2023 July 15]. Available from: https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/qps-overview. Google Scholar 15Johnston G, Crombie IK, Alder EM et al. Reviewing audit: barriers and facilitating factors for effective clinical audit. Qual Health Care 2000; 9: 23–36. 10.1136/qhc.9.1.23 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Volume93, Issue10October 2023Pages 2278-2280 ReferencesRelatedInformation
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要