谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Prognostic Value of Baseline Echocardiographic Parameters in Heart Failure with Improved Versus Non-Recovered Ejection Fraction

CJC open(2023)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
BackgroundEjection fraction is often used as a prognostic indicator and for classifying heart failure patients. This study evaluates the association of echocardiographic parameters with heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF).MethodsThis single-center study retrospectively included heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients from a cohort of admitted patients over 2018-2020, which were then followed up prospectively until 2023. The control group was categorized as non-recovered HFrEF and the population group was categorized as HFimpEF.ResultsA total of 176 patients with HFrEF were included in the study. Non-ischemic etiology was found to be the most prevalent cause of HFimpEF. The baseline echocardiography examination revealed that the HFimpEF group exhibited significantly higher values for tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) (P < 0.001) and inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter (P < 0.001). On the other hand, the non-recovered HFrEF group demonstrated higher baseline left atrial volume index (LAVi) values (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, higher value of TAPSE (OR 3.071; P = 0.008) and lower value of LAVi (OR 2.034; P = 0.008) were independent echocardiography variables associated with HFimpEF. After a mean follow-up duration of 32.5 ± 9.1 months, the HFimpEF group had higher survival from re-hospitalization due to worsening HF and lower all-cause mortality (Log Rank P < 0.001 and P = 0.005, respectively).ConclusionsBaseline echocardiographic parameters of higher TAPSE and lower LAVi were associated with the transition from HFrEF to HFimpEF. The HFimpEF group had better survival compared to non-recovered HFrEF.
更多
查看译文
关键词
baseline echocardiographic parameters,heart failure,prognostic value,non-recovered
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要