Local Integration of Urban-Rural Social-assistance Programmes in China: What Are the Driving Forces?

This study investigates what drives local variations when pursuing urban-rural equity in social welfare provision in China. We examine how internal features, top-down pressure and horizontal competition have shaped local governments' decisions to adopt a policy that unifies (yitihua) the urban and rural eligibility thresholds of the world's largest means-tested cash transfer programme (dibao). We collected and coded policies that unify urban-rural dibao thresholds in 336 prefecture-level divisions between 2011 and 2019. Event history analysis showed that internal fiscal constraint - primarily cost concerns - drove local policy adoption; top-down pressure from provincial governments with a high degree of coercive power in policy directives exerted a significant impact; and the horizontal competition's effect was insignificant. Our findings indicate that fiscal arrangements and top-down policy directives from superior governments with higher coercive power are potent tools to accelerate the adoption of a social welfare policy that would otherwise be unappealing for local officials.