Prognosis after Heart Transplant in Patients with Hypertrophic and Restrictive Cardiomyopathy. A Nationwide Registry Analysis.
REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA(2024)
Hosp Univ Cent Asturias | Hosp Univ & Politecn La Fe | Hosp Univ Clin Puerta Hierro Majadahonda | Complexo Hosp Univ A Coruna CHUAC | Hosp Univ Marques Valdecilla | Hosp Univ 12 Octubre | Hosp Univ Reina Sofia | Hosp Santa Creu I St Pau | Ctr Invest Biomed Red Enfermedades Cardiovasc CIBE | Hosp Univ Virgen Rocio | Hosp Clin Univ | Clin Univ Navarra | Hosp Univ Virgen Arrixaca | Hosp Univ Miguel Servet | Hosp Univ Gran Canaria Doctor Negrin | Univ Cantabria
Abstract
Introduction and objectives: Posttransplant outcomes among recipients with a diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) or restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) remain controversial. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a nationwide registry of first-time recipients undergoing isolated heart transplant between 1984 and 2021. One-year and 5-year mortality in recipients with HCM and RCM were compared with those with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Results: We included 3703 patients (3112 DCM; 331 HCM; 260 RCM) with a median follow-up of 5.0 [3.1-5.0] years. Compared with DCM, the adjusted 1-year mortality risk was: HCM: HR, 1.38; 95%CI, 1.07-1.78; P = .01, RCM: HR, 1.48; 95%CI, 1.14-1.93; P = .003. The adjusted 5-year mortality risk was: HCM: HR, 1.17; 95%CI, 0.93-1.47; P = .18; RCM: HR, 1.52; 95%CI, 1.22-1.89; P < .001. Over the last 20 years, the RCM group showed significant improvement in 1-year survival (adjusted R-2 = 0.95) and 5-year survival (R-2 = 0.88); the HCM group showed enhanced the 5-year survival (R-2 = 0.59), but the 1-year survival remained stable (R-2 = 0.16). Conclusions: Both RCM and HCM were linked to a less favorable early posttransplant prognosis compared with DCM. However, at the 5-year mark, this unfavorable difference was evident only for RCM. Notably, a substantial temporal enhancement in both early and late mortality was observed for RCM, while for HCM, this improvement was mainly evident in late mortality. (c) 2023 Sociedad Espanola de Cardiologia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
MoreTranslated text
Key words
Cardiomyopathy restrictive,Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy,Heart transplantation,Prognosis
求助PDF
上传PDF
View via Publisher
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
- Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
- We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
- We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
- The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
- Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Upload PDF to Generate Summary
Must-Reading Tree
Example

Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
2011
被引用150 | 浏览
2014
被引用14 | 浏览
2016
被引用47 | 浏览
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper