When is it safe to start venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after blunt solid organ injury? A prospective American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multi-institutional trial

JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY(2024)

引用 0|浏览11
暂无评分
摘要
BACKGROUND The optimal time to initiate venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis (VTEp) after blunt solid organ injury remains controversial, as VTE mitigation must be balanced against bleeding promulgation. Evidence from primarily small, retrospective, single-center work suggests that VTEp <= 48 hours is safe and effective. This study was undertaken to validate this clinical practice. METHODS Blunt trauma patients presenting to 19 participating trauma centers in North America were screened over a 1-year study period beginning between August 1 and October 1, 2021. Inclusions were age older than 15 years; >= 1 liver, spleen, or kidney injury; and initial nonoperative management. Exclusions were transfers, emergency department death, pregnancy, and concomitant bleeding disorder/anticoagulation/antiplatelet medication. A priori power calculation stipulated the need for 1,158 patients. Time of VTEp initiation defined study groups: Early (<= 48 hours of admission) versus Late (>48 hours). Bivariate and multivariable analyses compared outcomes. RESULTS In total, 1,173 patients satisfied the study criteria with 571 liver (49%), 557 spleen (47%), and 277 kidney injuries (24%). The median patient age was 34 years (interquartile range, 2549 years), and 67% (n = 780) were male. The median Injury Severity Score was 22 (interquartile range, 1429) with Abbreviated Injury Scale Abdomen score of 3 (interquartile range, 23), and the median American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade of solid organ injury was 2 (interquartile range, 23). Early VTEp patients (n = 838 [74%]) had significantly lower rates of VTE (n = 28 [3%] vs. n = 21 [7%], p = 0.008), comparable rates of nonoperative management failure (n = 21 [3%] vs. n = 12 [4%], p = 0.228), and lower rates of post-VTEp blood transfusion (n = 145 [17%] vs. n = 71 [23%], p = 0.024) when compared with Late VTEp patients (n = 301 [26%]). Late VTEp was independently associated with VTE (odd ratio, 2.251; p = 0.046). CONCLUSION Early initiation of VTEp was associated with significantly reduced rates of VTE with no increase in bleeding complications. Venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis initiation <= 48 hours is therefore safe and effective and should be the standard of care for patients with blunt solid organ injury.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Venous thromboembolic event,venous thromboembolic prophylaxis,missed doses,solid organ injury,nonoperative management
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要