Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Two Cleft Palate Simulators of Furlow Double-Opposing Z- Palatoplasty: a Comparative Study

BMC Surgery(2023)

West China Hospital of Stomatology

Cited 0|Views4
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of the porcine tongue for palatoplasty simulation compared to 3D-printed simulators and their surgical education role. Materials and methods A total of 18 senior cleft surgeons participated in a palatoplasty simulation-based workshop conducted using porcine tongue simulators and 3D-printed simulators. This workshop consisted of a didactic session followed by a hands-on simulation session. Each participant independently used both simulators to perform Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty, which was assessed and scored by senior cleft surgeons using a scoring system including organizational flexibility and ductility, anatomical design simulation, proper incision, proper suturing, and convenience of operation. A paired t test was used for data statistical analysis and a P value < 0.05 was regarded as a statistically significant difference. Results All senior cleft surgeons strongly agreed that the simulation-based workshop was a valuable learning experience, and both simulators were useful and easy to manipulate (P = 1.00). The results of this comparative study showed that a porcine tongue palatoplasty simulator had an effectively significant difference in terms of organizational flexibility and ductility (P = 0.04), and suturing was better than the 3D-printed palatoplasty simulator (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the simulators regarding anatomical design simulation (P = 0.76) and incision simulation (P = 0.65). Conclusion Both porcine tongue simulator and 3D-printed simulator have their unique strengths in surgical education for palatoplasty. Thus, the combined use of a porcine tongue and a 3D-printed cleft palate simulators are efficient as an educational model to practice Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty. The porcine tongue simulators are superior in terms of organizational flexibility, ductility, and suturing simulators, while with the 3D-printed simulator, various palatoplasty techniques can be repeatedly practiced with better-simulated face and oral cavity.
More
Translated text
Key words
Cleft palate,Surgical procedures,Training,Simulation,Residency
PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
  • Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
  • We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
  • We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
  • The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
  • Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Try using models to generate summary,it takes about 60s
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:本研究对比了猪舌模拟器和3D打印模拟器在Furlow双对抗Z成形术的教学效果,发现猪舌模拟器在组织灵活性和缝合方面优于3D打印模拟器,但在解剖设计模拟和切口模拟方面两者无显著差异。

方法】:通过举办一个包含教学和动手操作环节的唇腭裂修复手术模拟工作坊,让18位资深唇腭裂外科医生分别使用猪舌模拟器和3D打印模拟器进行Furlow双对抗Z成形术的操作,并使用评分系统评估其表现。

实验】:实验使用了猪舌模拟器和3D打印模拟器,通过资深唇腭裂外科医生的评分,使用配对t检验对数据进行分析,P值小于0.05视为有统计学意义的差异。结果显示,猪舌模拟器在组织灵活性和缝合方面具有显著优势,而在解剖设计模拟和切口模拟方面与3D打印模拟器没有显著差异。