谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Toxicologic Pathology Forum: Opinion on Performing Good Laboratory Practice Histopathology Evaluation for Nonclinical Toxicity Studies in a Remote Location.

Renee R. Hukkanen, Michelle Trapani, Tana Derringer, Victoria Laast,Zbigniew W. Wojcinski,Rosa Anna Manno,Matthias Rinke,Eric van Esch,Alys E. Bradley, Patrizia Cristofori,Roger Alison, Barb Munch

Toxicologic pathology(2023)

引用 0|浏览8
暂无评分
摘要
Toxicologic/veterinary pathologists are working remotely from Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) test facilities (TFs) in increasing numbers, most commonly in home-office settings. A study pathologist (SP) generating data on GLP-compliant nonclinical studies must be keenly aware of applicable national GLP regulations and comply with TF and protocol requirements. This Toxicological Pathology Forum Opinion Piece will summarize primary areas of emphasis for the SP generating GLP data using glass slides. Peer review and digital review of whole slide images are out of scope for this opinion piece. Key GLP considerations for primary pathology on glass slides are discussed with respect to SP location and employment status, including pathologist qualifications, specimen management, facilities, equipment, archive, and quality assurance. Notable differences between national GLP regulations of the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, France, Ireland, Switzerland, Italy, and Israel are presented. With the understanding that each combination of location and employment is unique, the authors provide a general overview of considerations for successful remote GLP work.
更多
查看译文
关键词
remote histopathology,GLP,FDA,EPA,OECD
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要