谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Finding and Evaluating Randomised Controlled Trials in Nursing Conducted by Spanish Research Teams: A Scoping Review

Melixa Medina‐Aedo, Elena Torralba‐Martinez, Cristian Segura‐Carrillo,Diana Buitrago‐García,Ivan Solà,Héctor Pardo‐Hernández, Xavier Bonfill

Health Information &amp Libraries Journal(2022)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
AbstractBackground/objectivesTo identify and assess the main characteristics and the potential risk of bias of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in nursing conducted by Spanish research teams.MethodsScoping review of an electronic search in three major databases (date of search: October 2021). For the eligible studies, both descriptive data, and data to assess the potential risk of bias, were collected and analysed.ResultsOf 3391 references retrieved, 199 were eligible. These RCTs were published in 122 journals, most of them in English (101, 82.1%) and were included in the Journal Citation Report (JCR) (107, 87.7%). Moreover, 32 (26.2%) of those included in the JCR were classified under nursing. Two thirds (81, 66.4%) of the journals followed the CONSORT guidelines. A total of 65 RCTs (33.7%) had a high overall risk of bias.DiscussionMost of the identified RCTs were published in journals not specific to nursing and in English language. Also, shortcomings in RCT design and reporting were observed despite recommendations to adhere the CONSORT guidelines.ConclusionComprehensive identification of RCTs in nursing may require searching in journals other than nursing‐related. RCTs from Spanish research teams are more likely to be published in international journals published in English. CONSORT should be strongly advised to encourage proper design and reporting of RCTs.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Risk of Bias
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要