Important collaborative conditions for successful economic outcomes of work disability management: A mixed methods multiple case study

BACKGROUND: Work disability management (WDM) interventions have usually focused on a single factor and its impact on outcomes such as employee health orwork disability costs. Research on company-levelWDMactivities and their economic impact is scarce. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explain the change in company-level work disability costs and their relation to WDM practices, and to identify the mechanisms of impact through which the successful economic outcome emerged. METHODS: The study design was a convergent mixed methods design with a multiple case study. The data from 14 business units concerned business context, personnel, investments in and processes of WDM, and the costs of work disability in 20102013. The data were constructed into case descriptions which were analysed using qualitative comparative analysis. The economic analysis was carried out from the employers' perspective. RESULTS: Five business units gained net benefits of approximately 1.5-2.5% of the payroll sum from their investments in WDM. These benefits were characterised by a combination of four strategic processes: i) dismantling barriers to co-operation, ii) improving the visibility of the strategic goals of work ability management in everyday practice, iii) WDMactions targeting the company's main work disability risks, and iv) the facilitation of multi-actor co-operation through co-ordination and flow of information. CONCLUSION: Strategic processes to support the effectiveness of WDM were found. When aiming for economic success in work disability management, in addition to measuring and managing disability costs, it is also essential to maintain collaborative operations in everyday practice.