Loss assessment of rigid-frame bridges under horizontal and vertical ground motions

Previous investigations have attributed some reinforced concrete (RC) bridge piers suffered significant damages during large earthquakes due to vertical ground motion effects. This has motivated this study to investigate the use of concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) columns as a more resilient and sustainable alternative to resist combined horizontal and vertical ground motions. The classic performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) framework is used to examine the seismic performance of a rigid-frame bridge with construction options of circular RC, circular CFST, and square CFST columns. The hysteretic response of each column is calibrated to the results of hybrid testing of columns under combined horizontal and vertical ground motions. The incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) is conducted using a suite of 50 near-fault records. The results are used to compare the observed damage states and quantify the repair sustainability metrics including repair cost (economic), repair downtime (social), and repair carbon emissions (environmental), as well as the loss of resilience. The losses are integrated with the hazard curves to compute the expected annual losses, all defined as a set of decision variables in the PBEE framework. The results confirm the outstanding seismic performance of CFST columns and highlight their benefits in improving the resilience and sustainability of critical and post-disaster bridges that are prone to strong multi-directional ground motions.