Comparative Pasture Management on Canadian Cattle Ranches with and Without Adaptive Multipaddock Grazing

Significant interest exists in the potential for specialized grazing systems, including adaptive multipaddock (AMP) grazing, to enhance grassland health and function. However, specific pasture management practices associated with AMP grazing at the ranch level remain poorly understood in comparison with more regionally representative management systems. As part of a larger study examining grazing effects on soil carbon, greenhouse gases, and other ecosystem attributes, here we report on differences in disturbance history and grazing management practices on a sample of AMP operators and their neighboring (n-AMP) ranches at 32 paired sites across the prairie provinces of western Canada. Most ranches studied (77.5%) relied on pastures composed of introduced (seeded) forage. On average, the AMP ranches surveyed were larger in size, supported greater animal numbers, and were more likely to use seeded forages comprising diverse mixes. Relative to n-AMP ranches, AMP ranches used 18.6-fold higher average stock densities in smaller paddocks (22.3 vs. 120.7 ha) while grazing over a grazing season that was 76 d longer, although computed stocking rates remained similar (P ≥ 0.10). AMP operators specifically used much shorter grazing periods (2.8 d) during the early growing season (i.e., before August 1) that were followed by a prolonged rest period (69 d) and could be used to compute a rest-to-grazing ratio for the first half of the grazing season for all ranches. This ratio, along with cattle stock density computed at the pasture scale, exhibited the greatest potential to differentiate the two groups of ranchers. Finally, both groups, and in particular ranchers within the AMP group, demonstrated high variability in management practices among individual operators, highlighting the importance of using specific management metrics rather than generalized descriptors of “grazing system type” to interpret their influence.