Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

The Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinimetric Properties of Screening Instruments to Identify Frail Older Adults Attending Emergency Departments: A Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

International journal of environmental research and public health(2022)SCI 3区

Mercy Univ Hosp | Natl Univ Ireland | Univ Bologna | Univ Coll Cork

Cited 6|Views28
Abstract
Background: Prompt and efficient identification and stratification of patients who are frail is important, as this cohort are at high risk of adverse healthcare outcomes. Numerous frailty screening tools have been developed to support their identification across different settings, yet relatively few have emerged for use in emergency departments (EDs). This protocol provides details for a systematic review aiming to synthesize the accumulated evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy and clinimetric properties of frailty screening instruments to identify frail older adults in EDs. Methods: Six electronic databases will be searched from January 2000 to March 2021. Eligible studies will include adults aged ≥60 years screened in EDs with any available screening instrument to identify frailty (even if not originally designed for this purpose). Studies, including case-control, longitudinal, and cohort studies, will be included, where instruments are compared to a reference standard to explore diagnostic accuracy. Predictive accuracy for a selection of outcomes, including mortality, institutionalization, and readmission, will be assessed. Clinical and methodological heterogeneity will be examined, and a random effects meta-analysis performed if appropriate. Conclusion: Understanding whether frailty screening on presentation to EDs is accurate in identifying frailty, and predicting these outcomes is important for decision-making and targeting appropriate management.
More
Translated text
Key words
frailty,frailty screening tools,emergency department,older adult,systematic review,diagnostic accuracy
PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
  • Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
  • We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
  • We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
  • The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
  • Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Try using models to generate summary,it takes about 60s
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:本研究旨在对急诊部门中用于识别虚弱老年人的筛查工具的诊断准确性和临床计量特性进行系统性回顾和荟萃分析,以评估其识别虚弱老年人的有效性和预测不良健康结果的能力。

方法】:研究将通过检索六个电子数据库,收集2000年1月至2021年3月间发表的、针对60岁及以上急诊患者使用各类虚弱筛查工具的研究数据,纳入包括病例对照、纵向和队列研究,并对筛查工具与参考标准的诊断准确性进行比较。

实验】:该研究将评估所选结果(包括死亡率、机构化和再住院率)的预测准确性,考察临床和方法学异质性,并在适当的情况下进行随机效应荟萃分析;具体的数据集名称在文中未提及。