谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

100P Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients (pts) with NTRK Fusion-Positive (NTRK+) Metastatic / Locally Advanced (LA) Solid Tumours Receiving Non-Trk Inhibitor (trki) Standard of Care (soc), and Prognostic Value of NTRK Fusions in Clinical Practice

G. D. Demetri, S. Peters, D. P. Hibbar, J. Davies,S. L. Maund,L. Veronese,H. Liu,O. Humblet,L. Perez

Annals of Oncology(2021)

引用 5|浏览13
暂无评分
摘要
NTRK fusions are actionable biomarkers with efficient and well tolerated TRKis. Clinical profile and outcomes of pts with NTRK+ tumours receiving non-TRKi SoC are unknown and the prognosis of NTRK+ pts vs pts with NTRK fusion-negative (NTRK–) tumours is not well known. Demographic and clinical data for TRKi-naïve adults with metastatic/LA solid tumours and ≥1 Foundation Medicine NGS test (1 Jan 2011 – 31 Dec 2019) were extracted from a US electronic health record-derived clinicogenomic database (CGDB; Flatiron Health). NTRK– pts from the CGDB were matched 10:1 to NTRK+ pts based on cancer type and propensity score with preselected prognostic variables (age; smoking status; practice type; lines of therapy from initial diagnosis to NGS report; stage at diagnosis; time from metastatic/LA diagnosis to NGS report; co-mutations). Overall survival (OS), defined as time from index date (metastatic/LA stage diagnosis or start of last treatment) to death/censoring, was compared between NTRK+ and matched NTRK– cohorts. NTRK fusion prognostic value was evaluated via univariate Cox proportional hazard model. Of 58001 CGDB pts with solid tumours, 28 had NTRK+ metastatic/LA cancers. NTRK+ pts tended to be younger, with less history of smoking, more brain metastases and a shorter time from advanced diagnosis to first NGS report vs all NTRK– pts; no differences were significant (Table). Median (95% CI) OS was 10.2 months (7.2–14.1) in NTRK+ pts vs 10.4 months (6.7–14.3) in matched NTRK– pts (n=280); hazard ratio (HR; 95% CI) for death was 1.6 (1.0–2.5). Results were similar using start of last treatment as index (HR 1.6; 1.0–2.5).Table: 100P% of ptsAll NTRK- pts (n=24903)Matched NTRK- pts (n=280)NTRK+ pts (n=28)Age ≥65 years49.643.939.3History of smoking No40.554.657.1ECOG PS 0–1 / 2–4 / Unknown49.7 / 12.1 / 38.1N/A*50.0 / 7.1 / 42.9Practice type Academic / Community11.4 / 88.618.9 / 81.114.3 / 85.7Lines of therapy from diagnosis to NGS report 0–2 / ≥3 / Unknown68.0 / 19.4 / 12.670.0 / 10.4 / 19.671.4 / 10.7 / 17.9Stage at initial diagnosis 0–II / III–IV / Unknown17.8 / 72.0 / 10.216.8 / 66.8 / 16.417.9 / 64.3 / 17.9Brain metastases Yes / No or Unknown10.6 / 89.4N/A*17.9 / 82.1Metastatic/advanced diagnosis to NGS report Mean (SD), days272.10 (446.92)158.95 (371.16)151.21 (245.20)*ECOG PS and brain metastases not matched due to high % unknown Open table in a new tab *ECOG PS and brain metastases not matched due to high % unknown In this small cohort of TRKi-naïve pts, OS was similarly poor in pts with NTRK+ metastatic/LA cancers vs matched NTRK– pts; this contrasts with improved OS in pts with NTRK+ tumours who receive TRKi therapy.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Biomarker Analysis
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要