Post-Operative Pain And Recovery In Patients With Nephrolithiasis: Results From The Endourological Society Tower Research Collaborative

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP14-16 POST-OPERATIVE PAIN AND RECOVERY IN PATIENTS WITH NEPHROLITHIASIS: RESULTS FROM THE ENDOUROLOGIC SOCIETY TOWER RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE Amanda Jones, Christian Rodriguez, George Lin, Hanna Stambakio, Ben Chew, Joshua Stern, and Justin Ziemba Amanda JonesAmanda Jones More articles by this author , Christian RodriguezChristian Rodriguez More articles by this author , George LinGeorge Lin More articles by this author , Hanna StambakioHanna Stambakio More articles by this author , Ben ChewBen Chew More articles by this author , Joshua SternJoshua Stern More articles by this author , and Justin ZiembaJustin Ziemba More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002543.16AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Nephrolithiasis is among the most common urological conditions. However, the impact of the disease on quality of life remains significantly understudied, particularly following surgical intervention. We prospectively captured patient-reported pain interference in patients following ureteroscopy (URS) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for nephrolithiasis. METHODS: Adults undergoing URS or PCNL for renal/ureteral stones were eligible for inclusion (10/2020-10/2021). Patients prospectively completed PROMIS- Pain Interference instrument pre-operatively (POD 0) and via email on POD 1, 7, and 14. Scores are reported as T-scores (normalized to US pop., mean=50) with a change of 5 (0.5 SD) considered clinically significant. All post-operative ureteral stents and/or nephrostomy tubes were removed by POD 7. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients completed enrollment, 102 of which underwent URS and 43 of which underwent PCNL. For URS, there was an acute increase in pain interference between POD 0 and 1, but this recovered and even improved to below the baseline between POD 7 and 14 (repeated measures ANOVA; p <0.05) (Figure 1). For PCNL, there was a similar acute increase in pain interference between POD 0 and 1, but this was improved, although not completely recovered to the baseline even at POD 14 (repeated measures ANOVA; p<0.05) (Figure 2). CONCLUSIONS: Pain interference on work, family, and social obligations increases immediately post-operatively for both patients undergoing URS and PCNL. However, there appears to be a relatively rapid recovery for patients undergoing URS between POD 7 and 14, but patients undergoing PCNL experience a less drastic recovery with continued pain interference, albeit minimal beyond POD 14. Results offer meaningful insights to assist in counseling patients prior to the surgical treatment of nephrolithiasis. Source of Funding: None © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e238 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Amanda Jones More articles by this author Christian Rodriguez More articles by this author George Lin More articles by this author Hanna Stambakio More articles by this author Ben Chew More articles by this author Joshua Stern More articles by this author Justin Ziemba More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...