Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

The Landscape and Gaps in Open Source Fairness Toolkits.

ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI)(2020)CCF A

Univ Cambridge

Cited 155|Views20
Abstract
With the surge in literature focusing on the assessment and mitigation of unfair outcomes in algorithms, several open source ‘fairness toolkits’ recently emerged to make such methods widely accessible. However, little studied are the differences in approach and capabilities of existing fairness toolkits, and their fit-for-purpose in commercial contexts. Towards this, this paper identifies the gaps between the existing open source fairness toolkit capabilities and the industry practitioners’ needs. Specifically, we undertake a comparative assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of six prominent open source fairness toolkits, and investigate the current landscape and gaps in fairness toolkits through an exploratory focus group, a semi-structured interview, and an anonymous survey of data science/machine learning (ML) practitioners. We identify several gaps between the toolkits’ capabilities and practitioner needs, highlighting areas requiring attention and future directions towards tooling that better support ‘fairness in practice.’
More
Translated text
Key words
fairness,bias,algorithm auditing,open source toolkits,fairness toolkits,algorithmic fairness,bias detection,bias mitigation
PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
  • Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
  • We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
  • We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
  • The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
  • Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Try using models to generate summary,it takes about 60s
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
Pedro Saleiro, Benedict Kuester, Loren Hinkson, Jesse London,Abby Stevens,Ari Anisfeld,Kit T. Rodolfa,Rayid Ghani
2018

被引用173 | 浏览

Elettra Bietti
2020

被引用81 | 浏览

Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:本文针对现有开源公平性工具包的能力与商业环境中实践者需求之间的差距进行了研究,并提出了改进方向。

方法】:通过比较分析六个主流开源公平性工具包的优劣,以及通过探索性焦点小组、半结构化访谈和匿名调查数据科学/机器学习实践者的方式,识别工具包能力的不足。

实验】:研究采用探索性焦点小组、半结构化访谈和匿名调查的方式,未提及具体数据集名称,但得出了工具包与实际需求之间的差距,并指出了未来工具包发展的方向。