Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

The Role of Clips in Preventing Delayed Bleeding after Colorectal Polyp Resection: an Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology(2022)SCI 1区

Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr | VA White River Junct | Sapporo Med Ctr NTT EC | Univ Calif Riverside | Fukushima Med Univ | Sapienza Univ Rome | UPNA | Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr | Monterey Bay Gastroenterol Consultants | Univ Paris | Mayo Clin | Linkou Chang Gung Mem Hosp

Cited 9|Views32
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Nonpedunculated colorectal polyps are normally endoscopically removed to prevent neoplastic progression. Delayed bleeding is the most common major adverse event. Clipping the resection defect has been suggested to reduce delayed bleedings. Our aim was to determine if prophylactic clipping reduces delayed bleedings and to analyze the contribution of polyp characteristics, extent of defect closure, and antithrombotic use. METHODS: An individual patient data meta-analysis was performed. Studies on prophylactic clipping in nonpedunculated colorectal polyps were selected from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane database (last selection, April 2020). Authors were invited to share original study data. The primary outcome was delayed bleeding <= 30 days. Multivariable mixed models were used to determine the efficacy of prophylactic clipping in various subgroups adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: Data of 5380 patients with 8948 resected polyps were included from 3 randomized controlled trials, 2 prospective, and 8 retrospective studies. Prophylactic clipping reduced delayed bleeding in proximal polyps >= 20 mm (odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.88; number needed to treat = 32), especially with antithrombotics (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.35-0.99; number needed to treat = 23; subgroup of anticoagulants/double platelet inhibitors: n = 226; OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.16-1.01; number needed to treat = 12). Prophylactic clipping did not benefit distal polyps >= 20 mm with antithrombotics (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.79-2.52). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic clipping reduces delayed bleeding after resection of nonpedunculated, proximal colorectal polyps >= 20 mm, especially in patients using antithrombotics. No benefit was found for distal polyps. Based on this study, patients can be identified who may benefit from prophylactic clipping.
More
Translated text
Key words
Nonpedunculated,Colorectal Polyp,Prophylactic Clipping,Delayed Bleeding,Polypectomy,Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
  • Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
  • We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
  • We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
  • The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
  • Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Try using models to generate summary,it takes about 60s
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers

The Use of Clips to Prevent Post-Polypectomy Bleeding: A Clinical Review

Matthew A. O'Mara, Peter G. Emanuel, Aaron Tabibzadeh,Robert J. Duve,Jonathan S. Galati, Gregory Laynor,Samantha Gross,Seth A. Gross
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY 2024

被引用0

Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:本研究通过个体患者数据荟萃分析表明,预防性夹闭可减少非蒂性、近端大肠息肉切除后30天内延迟出血,尤其在抗血栓治疗患者中效果显著。

方法】:研究采用个体患者数据荟萃分析方法,从PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane数据库中选择相关研究,并邀请原作者共享原始研究数据。

实验】:纳入了3项随机对照试验、2项前瞻性研究和8项回顾性研究的5380名患者,共切除8948个息肉。结果显示,预防性夹闭显著降低了近端息肉直径大于等于20毫米的患者的延迟出血风险,对抗血栓治疗的患者尤为有效。对于远端相同大小的息肉,则未发现预防性夹闭能降低延迟出血风险。