谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing in Denmark—public Knowledge, Use, and Attitudes

Anne-Marie Gerdes, Line Nicolaisen, Egil Husum,Janne Bayer Andersen, Martin Dræbye Gantzhorn,Laura Roos,Birgitte Rode Diness

European journal of human genetics(2021)

引用 10|浏览12
暂无评分
摘要
Direct to consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) is offered by commercial companies, but the use in the general population has only been sparsely investigated. A questionnaire was sent to 2013 representative Danish citizens asking about their awareness and use of DTC-GT. Individuals who had undergone a genetic test were interviewed to determine if the results had been understood correctly. A pilot study with 2469 questionnaires was performed before this study. In total, 45.4% of the individuals ( n = 913/2013) had knowledge about DTC-GT and 2.5% ( n = (18 + 5)/913) previously had a genetic test by a private company and 5.8% through the public health care system ( n = (48 + 5)/913). Curiosity about own genetic information was the most frequent motivation (40.9%, n = 9/22) as well as knowledge of ancestry (36.4%, n = 8/22) and advice about lifestyle, exercise, or diet (36.4%, n = 8/22). Test of own disease risk was given as a reason in 27.3% ( n = 6/22) and seeking possible explanation of specific symptoms in 13.6% ( n = 3/22). 50% ( n = 11/22) answered that they had become concerned after the test, and 17.4% ( n = 4/23) had consulted their GP. Interviews in a subset of respondents from the pilot study revealed problems with understanding the results. One problem was how to interpret the genetic test results with respect to individual risk for a disease. For example, the difference between disease causing genetic variants in monogenetic diseases versus statistical risks by SNPs in multifactorial diseases was not understood by the respondents.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Medical ethics,Personalized medicine,Biomedicine,general,Human Genetics,Bioinformatics,Gene Expression,Cytogenetics
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要