谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF CHRONIC VAGUS NERVE-STIMULATION FOR TREATMENT OF MEDICALLY INTRACTABLE SEIZURES

R GEORGE, A SONNEN,A UPTON,M SALINSKY,R RISTANOVIC,D BERGEN,W MIRZA,W ROSENFELD,D NARITOKU,R MANONESPAILLAT,G BAROLAT, J WILLIS, H STEFAN,T TREIG, A HUFNAGEL,R KUZNIECKY,B UTHMAN,BJ WILDER, L AUGUSTINSSON,E BENMENACHEM, E RAMSAY, JF WERNICKE,WB TARVER

NEUROLOGY(1995)

引用 423|浏览20
暂无评分
摘要
Preliminary reports have suggested that chronic, intermittent stimulation of the vagus nerve (VNS) is an alternative treatment for patients with medically refractory seizures. We performed a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive VNS in patients with poorly controlled partial seizures. An implanted, programmable pacemaker-like device was connected to two stimulating electrodes wrapped around the left vagus nerve. One hundred fourteen patients were randomized to receive 14 weeks of high-level stimulation (presumed therapeutic dose) or low-level stimulation (presumed subtherapeutic dose) using a blinded, parallel study design. Seizure frequency was compared with a 12-week baseline. Mean reduction in seizure frequency was 24.5% for the "high" stimulation group versus 6.1% for the "low" stimulation group (p = 0.01). Thirty-one percent of patients receiving high stimulation had a seizure frequency reduction of greater than or equal to 50%, versus 13% of patients in the low group (p = 0.02). Treatment emergent side effects were largely limited to a transient hoarseness occurring during the stimulation train. One patient with no previous history of cardiac disease experienced a myocardial infarction during the third month of vagal stimulation. VNS may be an effective alternative treatment for patients who have failed antiepileptic drug therapy and are not optimal candidates for epilepsy surgery.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要