Reply to "Comment on 'An Alternative View of the Microseismicity along the Western Main Marmara Fault' by E. Batsi et al." by Y. Yamamoto et al.

Reply| January 07, 2020 Reply to “Comment on ‘An Alternative View of the Microseismicity along the Western Main Marmara Fault’ by E. Batsi et al.” by Y. Yamamoto et al. Evangelia Batsi; Evangelia Batsi 1Marine Geosciences Research Unit, Institut français de recherche pour l’exploitation de la mer (Ifremer), Plouzané, France Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Anthony Lomax; Anthony Lomax 2ALomax Scientific, Mouans Sartoux, France Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Jean‐Baptiste Tary; Jean‐Baptiste Tary 3Departamento de Geociencias, Universidad de los Andes, Bogota DC, Columbia Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Frauke Klingelhoefer; Frauke Klingelhoefer 1Marine Geosciences Research Unit, Institut français de recherche pour l’exploitation de la mer (Ifremer), Plouzané, France Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Vincent Riboulot; Vincent Riboulot 1Marine Geosciences Research Unit, Institut français de recherche pour l’exploitation de la mer (Ifremer), Plouzané, France Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Shane Murphy; Shane Murphy 1Marine Geosciences Research Unit, Institut français de recherche pour l’exploitation de la mer (Ifremer), Plouzané, France Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Stephen Monna; Stephen Monna 4Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Rome, Italy Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Nurcan Meral Özel; Nurcan Meral Özel 5Kandili Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute (KOERI), Cengelkoy, Istanbul, Turkey Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Hakan Saritas; Hakan Saritas 6Dokuz Eylül University (DEU), Alsancak, İzmir, Turkey Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Günay Cifçi; Günay Cifçi 6Dokuz Eylül University (DEU), Alsancak, İzmir, Turkey Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Namik Çagatay; Namik Çagatay 7Faculty of Mines, Department of Geology, Istanbul Technical University (ITU), Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Luca Gasperini; Luca Gasperini 8CNR, Institute of Marine Sciences (ISMAR), Bologna, Italy Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Louis Géli Louis Géli * 1Marine Geosciences Research Unit, Institut français de recherche pour l’exploitation de la mer (Ifremer), Plouzané, France *Corresponding author: Louis.Geli@ifremer.fr Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (1): 383–386. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120190052 Article history first online: 07 Jan 2020 Connected Content Companion: An Alternative View of the Microseismicity along the Western Main Marmara Fault Companion: Comment on “An Alternative View of the Microseismicity along the Western Main Marmara Fault,” by E. Batsi et al. Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Evangelia Batsi, Anthony Lomax, Jean‐Baptiste Tary, Frauke Klingelhoefer, Vincent Riboulot, Shane Murphy, Stephen Monna, Nurcan Meral Özel, Hakan Saritas, Günay Cifçi, Namik Çagatay, Luca Gasperini, Louis Géli; Reply to “Comment on ‘An Alternative View of the Microseismicity along the Western Main Marmara Fault’ by E. Batsi et al.” by Y. Yamamoto et al.. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2020;; 110 (1): 383–386. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120190052 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of the Seismological Society of America Search Advanced Search In their comment, Yamamoto et al. (2019) are primarily concerned with the existence and effect of large values of minimum and maximum phase residuals in our analysis and locations using the 2014 observations, as listed in tables S7 and S8 in the supplementary material of our paper (Batsi et al., 2018). We retain these large residuals in the tables and analysis because they have vanishingly small effect on the NonLinLoc locations, as the used, equal differential time location algorithm (Lomax, 2008; Lomax et al., 2009) is highly robust to outlier readings. In the... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.