谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Real-life Bioequivalence of Tacrolimus in Patients with Living-Related Donor De Novo Renal Transplantation: an Observational Study.

Transplantation proceedings(2020)

引用 1|浏览15
暂无评分
摘要
Tacrolimus is a narrow therapeutic index drug. As a result, regulatory agencies worldwide recommend stringent bioequivalence evaluation criteria for approval of generics. Despite this, the professional transplantation societies have raised concerns over the safety and efficacy of generic substitutions. We conducted this pragmatic real-life bioequivalence study to assess the effect of generic substitutions of tacrolimus. This was an observational study including recipients of renal transplantation who were considered for generic medication substitution. Transplanted organs were from living-related donors and were performed at least 1 month before the study. Time of administration of the drug, time of dosing with respect to meals, and time of blood sample collection were controlled; however, the lot number of the generic drugs was not controlled. The participants were allowed to use their usual supplies irrespective of the lot number. Concentration (C0) was quantified by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry after the generic substitution from ABC brand to XYZ brand. The average C0 ± SD with generic ABC was 11.09 ± 4.26 ng/mL and generic ABC was 9.7 ± 4.12 ng/mL. Though there was no statistically significant difference observed between the concentrations, when the individual patient data was examined, 2 patients were found to have a very high concentration of tacrolimus and at least 7 patients fell below the therapeutic range. These derangements called for retitration with the new generic tacrolimus (40%). The results of our study suggest that generic-to-generic substitutions should be carried out very carefully in a closely observed setting in patients with renal transplants. The strength of our study is that it matched the real clinical practice setting as much as possible unlike a bioequivalence study. Therefore, we recommend repeating C0 at least 3 times over a period of 7 to 10 days with a generic substitution to prevent untoward consequences.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要