IFN-γ Control of an Effector/Target Combination for Skin Allograft Rejection: Macrophage/Skin Components in Normal Mice or T Cell/Endothelial Cells in IFN-γ-Deficient Mice.

Ryotaro Yoshida,Shogo Maeda,Junko Tashiro-Yamaji,Emi Yasuda,Yuro Shibayama,Yoshinobu Hirose,Takahiro Kubota

Journal of Interferon and Cytokine Research（2020）SCI 4区

Osaka Med Coll

Cited 2|Views24

Abstract

Organ, skin, or cell allografts are acutely rejected from normal mice, whereas vascularized organ allografts, but not allografted Meth A cells, are rejected from interferon-γ (IFN-γ)-deficient mice. Here we explored effector/target combinations for i.p. allografted Meth A (cytotoxic T lymphocyte [CTL]-resistant) or RLmale1 (CTL-susceptible) cells into or for BALB/c skin (skin components: CTL resistant) onto normal or IFN-γ-deficient C57BL/6 mice. After allografting, normal mice showed more infiltration but only a little thrombosis/hemorrhage. Monocyte/macrophage MHC receptor (MMR)+ macrophages (on days 5-10) and T cell receptor (TCR)+ CTLs (on days 7-9) were cytotoxic against Meth A cells or skin components and RLmale1 cells, respectively, and the allografts were rejected. After allografting into IFN-γ-deficient mice, MMR- macrophages and highly activated TCR+ CTLs were induced, and the mice died of hemorrhagic ascites with Meth A cells and more acutely rejected RLmale1 cells. The CTLs on days 4-6 were inactive toward skin components at an in vivo effector/target ratio but injured endothelial cells to cause severe thrombosis/hemorrhage and more acute rejection of skin allografts. These results indicate that IFN-γ-dependent MMR expression was essential for macrophage-mediated cytolysis of allogeneic skin components and that IFN-γ-deficient mice more acutely rejected skin allograft by causing CTL-induced injury to endothelial cells.

Translated text

Key words

rodent,allograft,macrophage,T cell,IFN-gamma

Bibtex

AI Read Science

AI Summary

AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.

Example

Background

Key content

Introduction

Methods

Results

Related work

Fund

Key content

Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance

Try using models to generate summary,it takes about 60s

Must-Reading Tree

Example

Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper