谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Health Economics of Patient Blood Management: a Cost‐benefit Analysis Based on a Meta‐analysis

Vox sanguinis(2019)

引用 23|浏览11
暂无评分
摘要
Background and Objectives Patient Blood Management (PBM) is the timely application of evidence-based medical and surgical concepts designed to improve haemoglobin concentration, optimize haemostasis and minimize blood loss in an effort to improve patient outcomes. The focus of this cost-benefit analysis is to analyse the economic benefit of widespread implementation of a multimodal PBM programme. Materials and Methods Based on a recent meta-analysis including 17 studies (>235 000 patients) comparing PBM with control care and data from the University Hospital Frankfurt, a cost-benefit analysis was performed. Outcome data were red blood cell (RBC) transfusion rate, number of transfused RBC units, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Costs were considered for the following three PBM interventions as examples: anaemia management including therapy of iron deficiency, use of cell salvage and tranexamic acid. For sensitivity analysis, a Monte Carlo simulation was performed. Results Iron supplementation was applied in 3 center dot 1%, cell salvage in 65% and tranexamic acid in 89% of the PBM patients. In total, applying these three PBM interventions costs euro129 center dot 04 per patient. However, PBM was associated with a reduction in transfusion rate, transfused RBC units per patient, and LOS which yielded to mean savings of euro150 center dot 64 per patient. Thus, the overall benefit of PBM implementation was euro21 center dot 60 per patient. In the Monte Carlo simulation, the cost savings on the outcome side exceeded the PBM costs in approximately 2/3 of all repetitions and the total benefit was euro1 878 000 in 100 center dot 000 simulated patients. Conclusion Resources to implement a multimodal PBM concept optimizing patient care and safety can be cost-effectively.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要