谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Safety and Effectiveness of a 3-Day Rush Insect Venom Immunotherapy Protocol

Paula Kranert,Stephan Forchhammer,Sebastian Volc, Franziska Stenger,Martin Schaller, Joerg Fischer

INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY(2020)

引用 3|浏览4
暂无评分
摘要
Background: Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is an established and effective treatment for patients with Hymenoptera venom allergies. Especially during the build-up of VIT, systemic allergic reactions are a key issue. Objective: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of a 3-day rush insect VIT protocol and a strategy for the management of individuals with VIT-induced anaphylaxis. Methods: In this retrospective monocentric study, 11-year data regarding build-up cycles of VIT were retrieved from institutional records. The following parameters of VIT-induced anaphylaxis were analyzed: frequency, severity, time of occurrence within the build-up cycle, and impact on the success of VIT. The effectiveness of VIT was assessed by the results of sting challenges (SCs) by the culprit insect. Results: In total, 1,317 initial build-up cycles of VIT were evaluated in this study, and the frequency of VIT-induced anaphylaxis was 6.6%. Anaphylaxis occurred most frequently when the daily cumulative venom dose was >= 100 mu g. A group (n = 65) of patients with VIT-induced anaphylaxis in this dose range temporarily received a reduced maintenance dose, and without additional co-medications or complications, the target dose was reached after a second build-up in 91% of the cycles. After completing the VIT build-up, SCs were performed in 76.9% of the cohort, and the effectiveness of VIT was confirmed by 98.5% of the tests. Conclusions: In this study, we report a 3-day VIT rush protocol with a reasonable rate of VIT-induced anaphylaxis and excellent effectiveness of VIT. (C) 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
更多
查看译文
关键词
Safety,Insect venom allergy,Immunotherapy,Three-day rush protocol,Sting challenge
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要