Establishing an Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) Cut-off to Determine Polycystic Ovarian Morphology (PCOM) Supporting Diagnosis of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS): the Aphrodite Study
Fertility and sterility(2019)SCI 2区SCI 1区
Erasmus MC | Roche Diagnost Int Ltd | Roche Diagnost GmbH
Abstract
To derive and validate a cut-off for AMH to discriminate PCOM using the Elecsys® AMH Plus immunoassay. APHRODITE is a case-control study of PCOS-positive (cases) and PCOS-negative (controls) women aged 25–45 years. Cases were defined using Rotterdam criteria, showing the full phenotype A (irregular cycles/ovulatory dysfunction, clinical or biochemical hyperandrogenism and PCOM); controls had an antral follicle count (AFC) ≤20, based on the new international guideline for PCOS. The discovery cohort included 290 cases and 575 controls, whereas the validation cohort consisted of 455 cases and 500 controls. Serum levels of AMH were measured using the Elecsys® AMH Plus immunoassay; AFC was determined by transvaginal ultrasound. An AMH cut-off was optimised in the discovery cohort based on concordance analysis. Performance (sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve [AUC]) of the defined cut-off was evaluated in the validation cohort. Exploratory analyses in different sub-cohorts (including age groups) were also performed. Compared with controls, PCOS cases were younger (median age 29.0 vs 34.0 years), with a higher body mass index (median 29.2 vs 23.8 kg/m2) and higher AMH level (median 6.23 vs 2.13 ng/mL). Good correlation was observed between AMH and AFC in the discovery and validation cohorts, with Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.83 and 0.84, respectively. A serum AMH cut-off of 3.5 ng/mL (25 pmol/L) was determined in the discovery cohort, which achieved 85.9% sensitivity and specificity. In the validation cohort, this cut-off achieved 82.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 78.6–85.8) sensitivity and 89.8% (95% CI 86.8–92.3) specificity, with an AUC of 94.0% (95% CI 92.6–95.5). In women aged ≤35 years, the AMH cut-off of 3.5 ng/mL showed 84.2% (95% CI 81.3–86.9) sensitivity and 83.5% (95% CI 80.0–86.6) specificity; in women aged >35 years, specificity remained high (91.8% [95% CI 89.2–93.9]) but sensitivity was lower (77.4% [95% CI 63.8–87.7]). The Elecsys® AMH Plus immunoassay provides a robust method for identifying PCOM as part of PCOS diagnosis with a cut-off of 3.5 ng/mL (25 pmol/L).
MoreTranslated text
Key words
Anti-Mullerian Hormone
PDF
View via Publisher
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
- Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
- We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
- We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
- The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
- Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Try using models to generate summary,it takes about 60s
Must-Reading Tree
Example

Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
Age‐related Diagnostic Threshold of Anti‐müllerian Hormone for Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2020
被引用0
Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2021
被引用4
BIOMEDICA 2021
被引用0
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper
去 AI 文献库 对话