Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Impact of Treatment Sequence in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mcrpc) on Outcome in a Prospective Cohort Study.

Bone marrow transplantation(2019)SCI 3区

Spanish National Cancer Research Centre | Catalan Cancer Institute | Centro Oncologico de Galicia | Reina Sofía University Hospital | HOSPITAL VIRGEN DE LA SALUD | Hospital Costa Del Sol | Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon | Department of Medical Oncology | Hospital Arnau de Vilanova | Medical Oncology Department | CNIO-IBIMA Genitorurinary Cancer Clinical Research Unit | Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara | Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti | HOSPITAL JAEN | Hospital Son Llatzer | Hospital Universitario La Princesa | CNIO-IBIMA Genitourinary Cancer Research Unit | MEdical Oncology Department

Cited 6|Views126
Abstract
264 Background: Abiraterone (Abi), enzalutamide (Enza) and docetaxel (Doc) are all valid first-line (1L) mCRPC treatment options. Evidence suggests a degree of cross-resistance between agents, which may impact the efficacy of subsequent lines of therapy. Evidence on the optimal treatment sequence is lacking. Methods: We evaluated the outcome of patients (pts) treated with 1L Doc, Abi or Enza in the prospective PROREPAIR-B cohort study. We assessed the impact of 1L treatment option (Doc vs Abi/Enza) on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) to 1L-therapy (PCWG2) and PFS2 (time from initiation of 1L-therapy to progression on second-line [2L] therapy). Uni- (UV) and multivariable (MV) cox-regression models were used. MV model covariates included age (≥75 years), local therapy, Gleason Score, metastases at diagnosis, visceral metastases, ALP (≥ULN), LDH (≥ULN), haemoglobin (≤LNL), albumin (≤LNL) and ECOG PS. Results: 406 pts received 1L-Doce (N=188) or Abi/Enza (N=218). Pts receiving Doc were younger (p=0.002), had higher rates of visceral metastases (17.6 vs 8.7%; p=0.008), ALP (52.1% vs 40.4%; p=0.018), LDH (48.1% vs 31.2%; p<0.001) and lower Hb (7.4 vs 2.8%; p=0.029) and albumin (11.3 vs 4.6%). PFS was higher in pts receiving 1L-Abi/Enza (10.8 vs 8.3 months; HR:0.5; p<0.001). Pts receiving 1L Abi/Enza had higher rates of radiographic progression (88.4 vs 80%; p=0.032). 123/188 pts treated with 1L-Doc received 2L-Abi/Enza: 30 received other 2L and 35 had not started 2L. 111/216 pts treated with 1L-Abi/Enza received 2L-Doc, 26 were started on other 2L and 79 had not initiated 2L. A significant difference between pts treated with initial Abi/Enza vs Doc was observed in PFS2 (20.6 vs 16.6m; HR:0.78; p=0.006) but not OS (31.3 vs 29.9 m; HR:1.05; p=0.725). Choice of first-line agent was not associated with OS in the MV model. Conclusions: Despite longer PFS to 1L and PFS2 in pts treated with initial Abi/Enza, no differences in OS were observed between treatment sequences starting with Doc vs Abi/Enza. Pts treated with 1L-Doc had worse baseline prognostic features. Molecular stratification may enable biomarker-driven patient selection to optimize benefit in pts. (NCT03075735).
More
Translated text
求助PDF
上传PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
  • Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
  • We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
  • We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
  • The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
  • Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Upload PDF to Generate Summary
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:该研究探讨了在转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)中,一线治疗药物(Doc、Abi、Enza)的使用顺序对总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的影响,发现不同治疗顺序对OS无显著差异,但对PFS2有显著影响。

方法】:通过前瞻性队列研究PROREPAIR-B,使用单变量和多变量Cox回归模型分析了一线治疗药物(Doc、Abi、Enza)对OS、PFS到一线治疗(PCWG2)和PFS2(从一线治疗开始到二线治疗进展的时间)的影响。

实验】:406名患者接受了一线治疗(1L-Doce组N=188,Abi/Enza组N=218),评估了基线特征和治疗结果。结果显示,1L-Abi/Enza组的PFS更高(10.8个月 vs 8.3个月),但PFS2和OS在两组间无显著差异。使用的数据集名称为PROREPAIR-B队列研究数据。