Increased Association Between Epstein-Barr Virus EBNA2 from Type 2 Strains and the Transcriptional Repressor BS69 Restricts B Cell Growth

Natural variation separates Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) into type 1 and type 2 strains. Type 2 EBV is less transforming in vitro due to sequence differences in the EBV transcription factor EBNA2. This correlates with reduced activation of the EBV oncogene LMP1 and some cell genes. Transcriptional activation by type 1 EBNA2 can be suppressed through the binding of two PXLXP motifs in its transactivation domain (TAD) to the dimeric coiled-coil MYND domain (CC-MYND) of the BS69 repressor protein (ZMYND11). We identified a third conserved PXLXP motif in type 2 EBNA2. We found that type 2 EBNA2 peptides containing this motif bound BS69CC-MYND efficiently and that the type 2 EBNA2TAD bound an additional BS69CC-MYND molecule. Full-length type 2 EBNA2 also bound BS69 more efficiently in pull-down assays. Molecular weight analysis and low-resolution structures obtained using small-angle X-ray scattering showed that three BS69CC-MYND dimers bound two molecules of type 2 EBNA2TAD, in line with the dimeric state of full-length EBNA2 in vivo . Importantly, mutation of the third BS69 binding motif in type 2 EBNA2 improved B-cell growth maintenance. Our data indicate that increased association with BS69 restricts growth promotion by EBNA2 and may contribute to reduced B-cell transformation by type 2 EBV. Author summary Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) drives the development of many human cancers worldwide including specific types of lymphoma and carcinoma. EBV infects B lymphocytes and immortalises them, thus contributing to lymphoma development. The virus promotes B lymphocyte growth and survival by altering the level at which hundreds of genes are expressed. The EBV protein EBNA2 is known to activate many growth-promoting genes. Natural variation in the sequence of EBNA2 defines the two main EBV strains: type 1 and type 2. Type 2 strains immortalise B lymphocytes less efficiency and activate some growth genes poorly, although the mechanism of this difference is unclear. We now show that sequence variation in type 2 EBNA2 creates a third site of interaction for the repressor protein (BS69, ZMYND11). We have characterised the complex formed between type 2 EBNA2 and BS69 and show that three dimers of BS69 form a bridged complex with two molecules of type 2 EBNA2. We demonstrate that mutation of the additional BS69 interaction site in type 2 EBNA2 improves its growth-promoting function. Our results therefore provide a molecular explanation for the different B lymphocyte growth promoting activities of type 1 and type 2 EBV. This aids our understanding of immortalisation by EBV.