Reference Interval Determination for Glycated Albumin in Defined Subgroups of a South African Population

Background Glycated proteins, such as glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and glycated albumin (GA%), are increasingly being used for glycaemic control assessment and the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. GA% is an intermediate marker of glycaemic control that is not influenced by factors that affect HbA1c concentrations. The aim of this study was to determine reference intervals and assess confounding factors for glycated albumin in a well-characterized healthy population in South Africa. Methods We measured glycated albumin using an enzymatic method on stored serum samples of healthy individuals recruited in Cape Town, South Africa. Reference intervals (overall and specific for age, sex and ethnicity) were determined using non-parametric methods and confounding factors were assessed using multiple regression analysis. Results The reference interval (2.5th to 97.5th percentile) for glycated albumin of 663 healthy individuals (mean age, 34 years, 38.6% males) ranged from 10.7 to 15.2%. Sex, body mass index categories and ethnicity were significantly associated with the glycated albumin and were considered of practical importance because their standardized regression coefficients (Beta) were greater than a cut-off of 0.15, implying a stronger effect on glycated albumin ( P < 0.001). The glycated albumin reference intervals for subjects with body mass index <25 kg/m2 was 11.2–15.3%, for body mass index 25–30 kg/m2 it was 10.5–14.9% and 10.0–14.6% for body mass index >30 kg/m2 ( P = 0.0001). Conclusions The overall reference interval showed good correlation with reference intervals determined in other studies. However, sex, ethnicity and body mass index were statistically significant confounding factors that may influence the overall reference interval. Therefore, overall glycated albumin reference intervals should be used cautiously.