谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

A.C impedance, XRD, DSC, FTIR studies on PbTiO3 dispersoid pristine PVdF-co-HFP and PEMA blended PVdF-co-HFP microcomposite electrolytes

R. Jayaraman,P. Vickraman, N. Muthu Venkata Subramanian,A. Simon Justin

Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids(2016)

引用 13|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
A.C impedance, XRD and thermal and FTIR studies were carried out for pristine PVdF-co-HFP(30wt.%)/PbTiO3(5wt.%) polymer microcomposite electrolyte membranes (PMCEs) by varying three EC:DMC–LiBETI compositions (62.5:2.5 (NP2), 60.0:5.0 (NP3) and 57.5:7.5 (NP4) wt.%). The higher conductivity was noted 7.99×10−5Scm−1 for NP4 and this account for better mobility of Li+ free cations. The studies were repeated by blending PEMA with PVdF-co-HFP in three blend ratios i.e., 7.5:22.5 (NP6) wt.% (1:3), 15:15 (NP7) wt.% (1:1) and 22.5:7.5 (NP8) wt.% (3:1) for the same EC/DMC–LiBETI compositions. While blending, the conductivity was decreased in general, and among the blend ratio, higher conductivity noted 4.60×10−5Scm−1 for 3:1 (NP8) however it was lower than the pristine NP4. The temperature dependence of PMCE pristine and blended systems obeys Arrhenius behavior. The XRD diffractogram registers the dominance of lead titanate in pristine and blended systems albeit intensity variations. In DSC studies, variation of ΔHm and Tm was noted due to PEMA, and hindrance of VdF crystallites was observed within its melting endotherm Tm range due to fixed dispersoid PbTiO3 which suggests that 3:1 ratio with 2.5wt.% LiBETI with 5wt.% PbTiO3 showed better thermal stability. DSC studies had not registered the effect of PEMA in the thermal scale scanned than pristine PMCEs. FTIR investigation confirms molecular interactions in the vibrational range 400–2000cm−1 w.r.t. CO, C–F and C–H stretchings.
更多
查看译文
关键词
PVdF/PEMA blend,DSC,A.C impedance,XRD,FTIR
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要