Safety and Efficacy of Contemporary Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Patients with a History of Cardioembolic Stroke in the Era of Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

BACKGROUND:The safety and efficacy of the contemporary atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in patients with a recent or previous history of cardioembolic stroke (CS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) remain to be established.METHODS:A total of 447 patients who underwent first-ever contact force (CF)-guided AF ablation with circumferential pulmonary vein isolation were included. Of these, 17 had CS or TIA within 6 months before ablation (Group 1), 30 more than 6 months before ablation (Group 2), and the other 400 without CS or TIA (Group 3). Procedural complications and recurrence of AF and atrial tachyarrhythmias were compared among the 3 groups.RESULTS:The mean age was 71±7, 66±9, and 61±11 years in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p<0.05, Group 1 versus Group 3). The oral anticoagulants were warfarin (n=108, 24.1%), dabigatran (n=101, 22.6%), rivaroxaban (n=147, 32.9%), apixaban (n=87, 19.5%), and edoxaban (n=4, 0.9%), and did not differ among the 3 groups. Median follow-up period was 14 [IQR 12-22], 13 [12-14], and 12 [10-16] months, respectively. One episode of cardiac tamponade, 2 episodes of arteriovenous fistula, and some minor complications occurred in Group 3, but no complications occurred in Groups 1 and 2 in the periprocedural period. Although one episode of CS occurred 11 days after the procedure in Group 3, there were no periprocedural CS, TIA, or major bleedings in Groups 1 and 2. AF recurrence-free rate after the procedure was 76.5%, 86.7%, and 79.1% in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and there was no difference in Kaplan-Meier curves among the 3 groups.CONCLUSION:The safety and efficacy of CF-guided AF ablation in the era of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with a recent or previous history of CS or TIA are similar to those in patients without it.